Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Insurance defense counsel: who is the client?

Article Abstract:

Whether the insurer and defense counsel enjoy an attorney-client relationship has long been a matter of controversy, and this was highlighted by the Michigan Supreme Court decision in Atlanta International Insurance Co v Bell. While the Michigan court did not find an attorney-client relationship, most jurisdictions do find that such a relationship exists between insurer and defense counsel. In this situation counsel has two masters, and the courts have not provided much guidance on who the duty of care is owed to. The ABA ethical guidelines on the subject were rescinded in 1980.

Author: Machanic, Scott L.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1992
Standards, Cases, Legal ethics, Conflict of interests (Attorneys), Conflicts of interest (Lawyers), Insurance law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The role of defense counsel in the tripartite relationship

Article Abstract:

The tripartite relationship between insured, insurer and the attorney hired to represent the insured by the insurer is confusing and a recent decision by the Michigan Supreme Court does little to clarify the overall situation. The Court ruled in Atlanta International Insurance Co v Bell that the attorney may be held accountable to the insurer, but this decision runs counter to numerous previous decisions involving the same issues. Furthermore, the Model Code and Model Rules do not resolve these issues for which specific guidelines are needed.

Author: DeMarco, Michael, Swartz, Elly D.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1992
Insurance industry, Attorneys, Lawyers, Political aspects, Malpractice, Legal malpractice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Obtaining evidence in England: the role of United States counsel

Article Abstract:

US lawyers can obtain evidence from companies in the United Kingdom by following the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Hague Evidence Convention. Attorneys can save time and money by using Rule 29 of the Federal Rules and being aware of the British corporate practice of voluntarily providing evidence. US attorneys can also obtain help from British solicitors.

Author: Gay, E. Phelps
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1997
United Kingdom, United States, International aspects, Discovery (Law), Civil procedure

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Protectionism versus free trade: implementing the GATT antidumping agreement in the United States. Binding the states: a survey of state law conformance with the standards of the GATT Procurement Code
  • Abstracts: An empirical survey and proposed Bankruptcy Code section concerning the propriety of bidding incentives in a bankruptcy sale of assets
  • Abstracts: The Civil Rights Act of 1991: continuing violation and the retroactivity controversy
  • Abstracts: Insurance companies should divest their tobacco investments. Tobacco money lights up Congress
  • Abstracts: The standard of review for the voluntariness of a confession on direct appeal in federal court. Taming a phoenix: the year-and-a-day rule in federal prosecutions for murder
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.