Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Integrating corporate law principles with CERCLA liability for environmental hazards

Article Abstract:

Corporate directors can be held personally liable for willful acts or omissions resulting in corporate environmental pollution under general corporate law theories of breached fiduciary duties and detrimental decisions falling outside of the business judgment rule. Recent legal trends seek to establish personal liability by equating director status with ownership status triggering strict liability under CERCLA. Ordinary corporate law doctrine, however, provides adequate, predictable remedies to punish directors who contaminate property while acting outside the scope of their delegated powers.

Author: Schipani, Cindy A.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1993
Toxic torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Enhanced scrutiny and corporate performance: the new frontier for corporate directors

Article Abstract:

Review of case law on directors' duties in corporate control situations indicates that the Delaware courts may be willing to extend the expanded scrutiny now being applied in takeovers to corporate performance issues. It is now generally accepted knowledge that directors can and do have influence on the returns of a corporation's stock. The increase willingness of courts to apply such duties may lead to breach claims against directors when companies underperform.

Author: Lipton, Martin, Mirvis, Theodore N.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


UNOCAL fifteen years later (and what we can do about it)

Article Abstract:

The author analyzes the impact of the Delaware Supreme Court's UNOCAL decision, in which the court developed an intermediate standard of review for appraising defensive tactics used by companies attempting to repel hostile takeovers. The court's preference for proxy contests over tender offers is discussed.

Author: Gibson, Ronald J.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 2001
Delaware, Practice, Judicial review, Corporate anti-takeover measures, Antitakeover strategies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Corporate directors, Corporation law, Delaware
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Rethinking disaster policy. Regulating environmental hazards. Exporting tort awards
  • Abstracts: Unifying tort and contract law in the age of data: what principles of liability are applicable when defective information causes physical harm or economic loss?
  • Abstracts: Genetic discrimination: Huntington's disease and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Americans with Disabilites Act as risk regulation
  • Abstracts: Online services can ease company filing burdens; corporate secretaries now can access libraries containing the most up-to-date state forms
  • Abstracts: Herbal garden of good and evil: the ongoing struggles of dietary supplement regulation. A bridge to far: the EPA's diesel sulfur rule and the increasing cost of fuels regulation under the Clean Air Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.