Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Genetic discrimination: Huntington's disease and the Americans with Disabilities Act

Article Abstract:

Persons genetically testing positive for Huntington's disease should be accorded the same legal protections, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, available to those who are HIV-positive. Sufferers of each disease share an uncertain disease onset period and a high liklihood of early death. Both groups can infect their unborn children and both can live symptomless for long periods. Presymptomatic Huntington's carriers should be considered disabled under the ADA, given the similarities to HIV-positive persons.

Author: Gin, Brian R.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
HIV patients, Huntington's chorea, Huntington's disease, Genetic discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Environmental regulation, cost-benefit analysis, and the discounting of human lives

Article Abstract:

Environmental contamination can cause the loss of human life in two ways: by causing latent harm, and by causing harm to future generations. Cost-benefit analysis uses discounting to account for the passage of time between exposure and harm. However, discounting is not equally appropriate for both latent harm and harm to future generations. For latent harms, intra-personal and intertemporal comparisons of utility are needed, while for future harms a metric for comparative purposes is necessary.

Author: Revesz, Richard L.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1999
Social aspects, Economic aspects, Human beings, Valuation, Cost benefit analysis, Humans, Environmental law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Americans with Disabilites Act as risk regulation

Article Abstract:

Disability advocates often argue for a technocratic approach to analyze the risks of allowing disabled persons access to the workplace. Starting from this beginning, the author shows that risk assesment techniques do not always fit neatly into conservative and liberal political catagories.

Author: Bagenstos, Samuel R.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2001
Methods, Risk assessment, Occupational health and safety, Occupational safety and health, Political aspects, Disabled persons

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mental disabilities claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and EEOC's guidelines. Employer rights and liability in regulating provocative dress in the workplace
  • Abstracts: A libertarian inside, looking out. The unintended consequences of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The end of market failure
  • Abstracts: Predicting ethical values and training needs in ethics. Ethics in employment law: the Americans with Disabilities Act and the employee with HIV
  • Abstracts: When does private discrimination justify public affirmative action? Two views of the river: a critique of the liberal defense of affirmative action
  • Abstracts: Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Challenging claims! Patenting computer programs in Europe and the USA
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.