Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Mental disabilities claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and EEOC's guidelines

Article Abstract:

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act protections for mentally disabled employees broadly define mental or psychological disorders and limit employers' information gathering. Employers can refuse to hire or can fire employees who pose a safety hazard but otherwise must accommodate mentally disabled individuals who can do the essential job functions with accommodation. Employees must inform employers of the disability. Discipline is allowed as long as all employees are similarly disciplined.

Author: Kelly, Eileen P., Rowland, Hugh C.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
Mentally ill persons, Mentally ill, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sexual harassment: an American judicial perspective

Article Abstract:

The expansion of sexual harassment case law and remedies as well as the increased national sensitivity to the issue dictates that employers develop clear policies and procedures for addressing sexual harassment complaints. Quid pro quo and hostile work environment causes of action are provided for under Title VII. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 expanded the remedies available to plaintiffs to include compensatory and punitive damages. Employers may be found liable under agency theories or negligence in failing to remedy harassing behavior.

Author: Voigt, Catherine, Conlon, Kevin J.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
Sex discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Employer rights and liability in regulating provocative dress in the workplace

Article Abstract:

Sexually provocative mandatory dress codes have been accepted only when they serve a business purpose and are applied evenly to men and women. Many sex-oriented businesses have not been held liable for sexually harassment resulting from dress codes because employees knew the nature of the business before accepting the job. However, this defense of welcoming the behavior is losing support with employers being held liable for unwanted sexual advances regardless of the business nature.

Author: Kelly, Eileen P., Seaquist, Gwen
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1996
Clothing and dress, Dress codes, Sex oriented businesses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Sexual harassment
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Disability Discrimination Act 1995: filling out the details. Disability Discrimination Bill
  • Abstracts: "Regarded as" disabilities under the ADA. Every breath you take: employee privacy rights in the workplace - an Orwellian prophecy come true?
  • Abstracts: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: the politics and pragmatics of punishment. Beyond impunity: can international criminal justice prevent future atrocities?
  • Abstracts: 'Retroactive liability' is challenged; courts, Congress may curb CERCLA liability, but how far they go raises some concerns
  • Abstracts: Coalition challenges state law guarding 'net IP; advocates argue that a Georgia statute violates free speech and interstate commerce
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.