Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Is DOJ above the rules? The department's bid to exempt lawyers from contact rule is blasted by states' chief justices

Article Abstract:

Tactics in the case of United States. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. present ex parte procedure problems. The issue in the case is whether McDonnell Douglas employees overcharged the federal government for work on Army and Navy aircraft, and Department of Defense investigators sent current and former employees a questionnaire asking about this practice. Company officials objected, saying its employees had counsel through the company and so the government's contact was improper. The Justice Department's answer was that its lawyers did not have to follow the ethics rules which govern others in the profession.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
United States, Ex parte procedure, Government attorneys

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Selective prosecution: are black officials investigative targets?

Article Abstract:

A disproportionate number of black public officials are the targets of criminal investigations. Prominent black politicians such as Marion Barry, Julian Bond and Andrew Young have suffered career setbacks after being investigated or prosecuted. Some believe the prosecutions are the result of a conspiracy to harass black leaders while others blame institutionalized racism and party affiliation. The fact that some black leaders are guilty of corruption has complicated the situation for those who are not.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Investigations, Ethical aspects, Political corruption, Criminal investigation, African American politicians

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Informant's testimony unravels case; 11th Circuit to decide if politically motivated arrest taints cocaine prosecution

Article Abstract:

The 11th Circuit will reconsider a trial court decision to throw out drug charges against twin brothers on the grounds that the sheriff's arrangement with the informant who sold drugs to the brothers was unfair and that they were arrested for political reasons. The US attorney claims the brothers would have engaged in illegal conduct regardless of the informant's attempt to entrap them, saying that other sources had confirmed their interest in illegal drugs.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Narcotics, Control of, Narcotics control, Cocaine, Entrapment (Criminal law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Japanese are stung on patents; lawyers alarmed by secret meeting rumors. BCCI suit: far-flung, massive; lawyers handle case of astounding dimensions
  • Abstracts: Finding sympathetic jurors; William Kennedy Smith defense lawyer reveals his tactics. Experts expected Smith verdict
  • Abstracts: Gentile's unanswered questions; drafters struggle to rewrite ethics rules on lawyers' out-of-court statements
  • Abstracts: An experiment in reform; like snowflakes, no two plans for reducing civil delays are alike
  • Abstracts: Bar examiners respond to the ADA; spurred by suits or the law, officials grant more test time to disabled applicants
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.