Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Is Texaco's counsel really independent? Experts ask whether Michael Armstrong is just a company advocate

Article Abstract:

Actions of the independent counsel hired by Texaco Inc. to investigate the discriminatory actions alleged in a Nov 4, 1996, New York Times article have raised the suspicion that Michael Armstrong, the independent counsel, may not be so independent after all. The inquiry's speed and the conclusions favorable to Texaco are what raised suspicions. Neil V. Getnick, president of a group issuing ethical guidelines for independent counsel, states that the defining factor is whether the counsel acts as an advocate for the company.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Texaco Inc., TX, Armstrong, C. Michael, Special prosecutors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


New antitrust chief Klein gets high marks

Article Abstract:

Joel I. Klein has been named acting chief of the US Justice Dept's Antitrust Div after Anne K. Bingaman's resignation. Klein was Bingaman's principal deputy. He is well respected by the antitrust bar for his sharp intellect, swift understanding of technical concepts and cordial manner. Klein will immediately have to deal with fresh complaints about the Microsoft Corp. Merger enforcement will be another priority.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
United States. Department of Justice. Antitrust Division, Government attorneys, Klein, Joel I.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ethics for 'independent' probes: can lawyers serve as both disinterested fact-finders and advocates for clients?

Article Abstract:

Law firms may find themselves facing ethical questions when they help corporations conduct independent ethics investigations. Independent probes have become a big source of business for some law firms, but critics say these firms are actually acting as advocates rather than as objective investigators. Attorney-client privilege is usually the chief ethics issue to consider in such investigations.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Corporations, Legal Services, Ethical aspects, Law firms, Business ethics, Legal ethics, Conflict of interests (Attorneys), Conflicts of interest (Lawyers), Confidential communications, Attorney-client privilege

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Officials and employees, Investigations, Lawyers, Practice
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: How inside counsel are shaping firms; panelists ponder whether general counsel are doing to lawyers what HMOs are doing to physicians
  • Abstracts: Increasing competition in the electric utility industry and decreasing consumer welfare: an antitrust paradox
  • Abstracts: Dead woman walking; commuted death sentence raises question whether females are treated more leniently. Peremptory-free zone; a federal judge won't allow such challenges in her courtroom
  • Abstracts: Remember: lawyering is business; to be a success, you have to be more than good: you have to market yourself. Portable assets: experiences of 8 years lawyering in Japan; it can be done, and it provides exportable skills, but be prepared to adapt
  • Abstracts: The role of industrial relations in achieving social equity: a comparison of labor laws in Australia and the United States
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.