Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Jury instructions

Article Abstract:

Jury instructions often prove confusing to their audience, which is rarely trained in the arcane legal language, so advocates of plain English in the courtroom are gaining ground. Judges frequently use legalese because they fear being reversed, or because an English version reveals the instruction's essential silliness. Jury instructions also deserve careful attention from litigators who can use them as a guide to the case, and to set themes that will re-echo in the judge's own words.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Interpretation and construction, Instructions to juries, Jury instructions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Twelve ways to a bad brief; following instincts may hurt a submission to the court

Article Abstract:

Bad legal brief writing happens in many ways and often involves the compounding of ordinary sins good lawyers are guilty of on a daily basis. These ordinary sins include undue length, too many issues, unreasonable or losing arguments, miscitation of a case or use of too many citations, lack of analysis and allowing personal feelings to intrude. Judges want to right wrongs and each brief should tell the story of a wrong to be righted.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Lawyers, Briefs, Legal briefs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A matter of style: what it takes to make legal writing look persuasive

Article Abstract:

Attorneys should keep certain principles in mind when composing a persuasive brief. An attractive appearance will not do a brief any harm. Language should be simple and direct. Lawyers should not lose sight of how their words sound. Word pictures should portray what happened. Rhetorical questions can focus the issue and let the reader know what really matters.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Legal composition

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Law, Legal language, Methods
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Towards a constructive public-private partnership to enforce competition law. State action as a defence against 81 and 82 EC
  • Abstracts: Authority or reason? The economic consequences of liability for breach of statutory duty in a comparative perspective
  • Abstracts: On the economics of health care. Health is making economy sick. Benefit costs are slowing but they are not really falling
  • Abstracts: Technology and wealth. From Internet to Intranet: benefiting your business. Promoting your business with a Web home page on the Internet
  • Abstracts: Rain no deterrent to First Lady's followers; conferees try pushing, arguing in quest to see a lawyer named Hillary
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.