Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Justices weigh a tax on judges; high court hears case over county levy that irks federal jurists

Article Abstract:

Two Alabama federal judges have balked at paying the county occupational tax, arguing that it is unconstitutional, violating the Constitution's supremacy clause, and the case has reached the Supreme Court.Two lower federal courts have agreed with Judge William M Acker and UW Clemon, but there is no indication as to where the high court is heading. The Jefferson County tax ordinance levies a license fee on all vocations or profession's within the county.

Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Taxation, Judges

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


9th Circuit upholds conviction; managers overseeing operations that cause environmental harm may be held criminally liable under the Clean Water Act

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in U.S. v. Hanousek upheld a felony conviction against a railway company manager for an oil spill into the Skagway River which occurred during a rock quarrying project at a site adjacent to the railway tracks which came under Hanousek's control. The 9th Circuit found that ordinary negligence was insufficient for this offence and only the criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act sufficed.

Author: Holscher, Mark C., Mosley, Paul E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Waste Management and Remediation Services, Water Pollution, Interpretation and construction, Oil pollution, Oil pollution of rivers, harbors, etc.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Festo case heads to high court; if a recent trend continues, justices will be less likely to defer to the Federal Circuit

Article Abstract:

The probability that Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. will eventually be reviewed by the US Supreme Court is discussed. The patent law's doctrine of equivalents came from Festo.

Author: Glinn, Patrick J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
Cases, Equivalents doctrine (Patent law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Getting a fix on fees: computers chip away at hourly billing in real estate matters. Real reform
  • Abstracts: Did GM and its lawyers suborn perjury in Ga. case? Claim is lawyers knowingly let a GM witness give false pretrial testimony
  • Abstracts: Fiduciary duties derailed? Appropriation of directors' duties in the battle for control of Conrail. Revisiting the import of shareholder consent for corporate fiduciary loyalty obligations
  • Abstracts: Franchising in the Canadian courts. Comments on proposed federal regulation of franchising. The new Commission Block Exemption: a blurry roadmap for franchising in Europe
  • Abstracts: Do parties to nuisance cases bargain after judgment? A glimpse inside the cathedral. Allocating the burden of proof in 60(b)(4) motions to vacate a default judgment for lack of jurisdiction
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.