Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Key libel case goes to trial; ruling on altered quotes is put to test

Article Abstract:

The trial of the libel case by psychoanalyst and author Jeffrey M. Masson against the New Yorker magazine began on May 10, 1993. The judge has ruled that since Masson is a public figure, 'clear and convincing evidence' of libel and 'reckless disregard for the truth' must be shown. Masson claims that Janet Malcolm, a New Yorker writer who authored a profile of him, libeled him by attributing to him quotes which he never uttered. Malcolm admits that she refined sloppy speech and used compression to make the piece more readable but denies putting words in Masson's mouth.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Masson, Jeffrey M., Malcolm, Janet

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Author sues Bender over 'bogus' treatise revision; sole practitioner says 31st narcotics law update is a consultant's 'cosmetic' job

Article Abstract:

Bronx sole practitioner David Bernheim has sued publisher Matthew Bender & Co in two venues, alleging the 31st update of his treatise 'Defense of Narcotics Cases' misappropriates his name. The book has sold some 13,000 copies since 1972 and Bender wrote updates for the first 30 revisions. Now he says the publisher found an excuse to fire him and paid a ghostwriter $2000 to recompile old material, making him seem incompetent or dishonest. The publisher denies wrongdoing, and other writers relate no similar problems.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
California, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, New York (State), Matthew Bender and Company Inc., Bernheim, David

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Libel suit spotlights rap 'hate-speak.' (suit against rap group N.W.A. by television host Denise Barnes)

Article Abstract:

The suit for libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought by Denise Barnes, host of the television program 'Pump It Up,' against rap group N.W.A. was dismissed on First Amendment grounds by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Valerie L. Barker on Dec 31, 1991. The dispute involved threats made by group members after clips from rival rap singer Ice Cube were inserted into an N.W.A. interview conducted by Ms. Barnes. Further 'hate-speak' litigation is expected.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Freedom of speech, Rap singers, Barnes, Denise, N.W.A. (Music group)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Libel and slander
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Fee change is a sea-change; but some seek way to skirt justices' limit on catalyst theory fees. High court to settle fee fight; weighs awards when civil rights suits are catalysts for change
  • Abstracts: Critical conditions; goal to reduce medical errors is fraught with difficulties. Trafficking in color; evidence challenged in race-based cop stops
  • Abstracts: Family law; religion as a custody issue. Stepparent custody and access. Family law; custody relocation cases
  • Abstracts: Legal secretary of lawyer lite? Growing use of paralegals raises questions about their function. P.D. funding struck down; New Orleans judge cites mind-boggling work load, orders hiring increase
  • Abstracts: For this lawyer, the beat goes on. Amtrak's big tests ahead. NASCAR's complex world
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.