Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Land of opportunity; can property owners sue over a city's regulatory decision?

Article Abstract:

The first case the Supreme Court will hear in its 1998-99 term is City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes, in which the city is challenging a damages verdict for a developer who was blocked from building on a strip of coastal property. The justices will rule on whether a denial of a building permit to landowners merits a jury trial and, if so, whether the permit is reasonable. Should the court answer both questions with yes, it would revolutionize land-use law, tilting it in favor of development. Local governments would face a large liability for a taking with each review of a development proposal.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Federalism, Land use, Coastal zone management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Combustible cases; will a car crash ruling lead to recognition of gay marriage?

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's ruling in Baker v. General Motors that there is no public policy exception to the Constitution's full faith and credit clause and but some gay rights advocates feel the battle over same-sex marriage will lean their way after Baker. If the Hawaii legislature, as expected rules that same-sex marriage is legal in that state, the full faith and credit issue becomes important as it means that same-sex marriage might also legal in the other 49.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Same-sex marriage, Full faith and credit (Law), Public policy (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Tell it to the grand jury: Whitewater special prosecutor forges full steam ahead with privilege battles

Article Abstract:

Special prosecutor Kenneth Starr's probe into President Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky has focused debate on the breadth and meaning of legal privileges. The President initiated court battles to clarify his executive privilege regarding top aides' testimony to a grand jury. Also, the Secret Service was swept into the debate when Starr called Secret Service agents to appear before the grand jury.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Investigations, Confidential communications, Attorney-client privilege, Executive privilege (Government information)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Lawyers target poor security; juries punish property owners for crimes on their premises. Punish after acquittal? Yes!
  • Abstracts: The EU for Brazil: a partner towards a 'fairer' globalization? The European union in the eyes of others: towards filling a gap in the literature
  • Abstracts: Repeal Employment Act. Yes: prosecutors must not act as legislators. Combined plan limit repeal; both employers and employees who participate in tax-qualified retirement plans can benefit from change in tax code
  • Abstracts: Speaking of a moot suit: procedure lesson accompanies rejection of English-only law case. Spuds spur veto fight: plaintiffs charge Line Item Veto Act violates separation of powers
  • Abstracts: Buyers should look out for IRS estate tax liens; property formerly owned by an estate may have a 'hidden' lien
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.