Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Laws leave passengers shipwrecked

Article Abstract:

The law poorly serves passengers on cruise boats by applying 19th-century standards to a highly sophisticated and lucrative venture in an industry where consumers' rights and remedies are expanding. Most cruise contracts include fine print establishing unfavorable forums and choice of law for any complaints, which must also be brought in unusually short time. Passengers should avoid ships' medical personnel, who are often contractors based abroad, and should obtain good travel insurance.

Author: Dickerson, Thomas A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Ocean travel, Laws, regulations and rules, Cruise lines

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Jurisdiction and the extraterritorial application of antitrust laws after Hartford Fire

Article Abstract:

The subject matter jurisdiction characterization approach, used by the US Supreme Court in Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, concerning antitrust violations in the international market, is based on flawed concepts. Courts should return to the earlier legislative jurisdiction characterization for conceptual clarity and consistency and add the jurisdictional rule of reason and interest balancing to the approach as they have been adopted in international conflict of laws.

Author: Trenor, John A.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1995
International aspects, Exterritoriality, Extraterritoriality, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Keeping Rufo in its cell: the modification of antitrust consent decrees after Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail

Article Abstract:

Antitrust consent decrees can be modified along the lines of two different models. These are the flexible judicial act model based on the Rufo decision and the contract model, exemplified by the United Shoe and Swift decisions, which utilizes a purpose test. A flexible standard may be a preferable approach, but it must be considered carefully by the courts, since they have unusual latitude in these cases given the divergent standards involved.

Author: Goldfarb, Jed
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1997
Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Case Note, Consent decrees, Jails

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Antitrust law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Breast Implants: The Cost of Vanity. Insurer liable for cost containment program: Wilson v. Blue Cross of Southern California
  • Abstracts: The proliferation of disputes, dispute settlement procedures and respect for the rule of law. Understanding the tobacco settlement: the state as partisan plaintiff
  • Abstracts: "No secrets" deal wins over gas showroom staff. Competition in gas industry on the front burner. Dispute Resolution Journal wins gold prize in national competition
  • Abstracts: Effectiveness of alcohol beverage warning labels: effects of consumer information processing objectives and color of signal word
  • Abstracts: Premarital HIV testing: the case of Mexico. Testing the force: HIV and discrimination in the Australian military
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.