Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Lawyers debate tragedy's lessons; firms re-evaluate security, but aren't likely to adopt rigid precautions

Article Abstract:

The Jul 1991 shooting spree at San Francisco, CA's Pettit and Martin has led law firms not only to review security procedures but also to realize that even the best safety measures cannot prevent all violent incidents. Pettit and Martin attorneys and staff have formed the Legal Community Against Violence to help the gun control movement. California State Bar Pres Harvey Saferstein called the law firm shooting a hate crime and suggested enhanced penalties for murdering attorneys, but since lawyers are not generally seen as disempowered, few thought this an apt description.

Author: Goldberg, Stephanie B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Crimes against, Pettit and Martin

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Caution no exemptions

Article Abstract:

Many lawyers find themselves empaneled as part of a jury, usually to their surprise, and most find the experience valuable both professionally and as a citizen. Many others, however, were disillusioned, finding that irrational decisions, willful ignorance of instructions, and outright racism determine verdicts. Some lawyers seek to conceal their profession, often out of ethical concerns, but often they are chosen as foreman. Hung juries created particularly frustrating experiences.

Author: Goldberg, Stephanie B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Jury selection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Welcome to the new uncertainty

Article Abstract:

The case against Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays and Handler, formerly one of the law firms advising Lincoln Savings, is causing much uncertainty in the legal community about the proper role of counsel during an adversarial investigation by regulators. This case culminated on Mar 2, 1992, with the Office of Thrift Supervision's temporary cease-and-desist order against the firm. The settlement figures are $4 million plus interest annually with an initial 1992 payment of $25 million.

Author: Goldberg, Stephanie B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Cases, Savings and Loan Associations Bailout Crisis, 1987-, United States. Office of Thrift Supervision, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays and Handler

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Attorneys, Lawyers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Prurient protections, prohibitions; this term's free speech cases involve sexually oriented expression. Speaking of firsts ... First Amendment free-speech cases may turn into blockbusters
  • Abstracts: Disclosure sets a time limit on IRS gift revaluation. Save transfer taxes with family limited partnerships. Avoid tripping on family limited partnership trap
  • Abstracts: Playing asbestos hardball; take it or leave it, company tells plaintiffs. Billions for asbestos bar? Keene Corp. says four firms earned $3.3 billion, but plaintiffs' lawyers scoff
  • Abstracts: Duty of consistency creates taxable estate. Second-to-die life insurance policy not included in gross estate. Stolen art objects includible in gross estate
  • Abstracts: Custody case brings calls for reform; advocates for children, birth parents disagree on need for new adoption laws
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.