Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Let companies fund executive pensions

Article Abstract:

The limits placed on eligible compensation and contribution amounts for highly paid executives should be eliminated so that executives can be given the same security as other employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The current limitations lead to inadequate retirement planning by executives and creates a two-class system. The nondiscrimination provisions for qualified plans should be retained to ensure that plans do not favor high-income employees. This reform would also do away with attempts to create unfunded nonqualified plans that appear to be funded.

Author: Cook, Frederic W., Paul, Robert D.
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1995
Pension funds

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Code s. 162(m) deduction limitation does not apply to compensation paid to officers who resign before year-end

Article Abstract:

The IRS in Private Letter Ruling 199910011 ruled that a corporation could deduct compensation paid to highly-paid executives and was not subject to the dollar limitation in IRC section 162(m)(1) where the executives were not employed on the last day of the corporation's taxable year. The employment date controlled in the determination of the statutory meaning of 'covered employee'.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1999
Public Finance Activities, Corporate Tax Deductions & Exemptions, Corporate taxes, Tax deductions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Developing a global executive rewards strategy

Article Abstract:

The authors discuss executive compensation strategies for international businesses to create a balance between their interests and retaining top executives.

Author: Barton, Ronald J., McNulty, Sean J.
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 2001
International, Analysis, Compensation management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Compensation and benefits, Executives, Executive compensation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Failure to provide COBRA coverage upon a reduction in hours does not violate COBRA due to existence of dual coverage and no significant gap in coverage
  • Abstracts: Same test for indirect discrimination under UK and EC law. No compensation for unintentional indirect discrimination
  • Abstracts: Executive order allows PTO action arbitration: ADR can resolve civil claims by private parties against the PTO
  • Abstracts: Venture-cap funds eschew investments in LLCs; benefits of the LLC form, such as flow-through taxation, are of little value to venture funds
  • Abstracts: Improving outside legal support to litigation managers: becoming radical. Complex product liability litigation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.