Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Same test for indirect discrimination under UK and EC law

Article Abstract:

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld the appeal of the Staffordshire County Council in a case where a part-time woman teacher had accused the Council of sexual discrimination. The industrial tribunal, which heard the case originally, saw no violation of the Sex Discrimination Act of 1975. However, it saw a breach of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome. The teacher cross-appealed the dismissal of the SDA violation and the Council appealed the Article 119 claim. The EAT dismissed the cross-appeal.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995
International relations, European Community, European Economic Community

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No compensation for unintentional indirect discrimination

Article Abstract:

An industrial tribunal may not award compensation for unintentional indirect sex discrimination, according to a 1995 UK Employment Appeals Tribunal interpretation of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. A part-time worker dismissed for refusing to work full-time could not receive compensation. However, she might have received compensation under the Equal Treatment Directive, if she had been a public sector employee.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Direct sex discrimination against transsexual

Article Abstract:

Prolonged harassment of a transsexual by colleagues following her coming-out constituted sex discrimination according to the British Employment Appeals Tribunal in Chessington World of Adventures Ltd. v. Reed. The reason for the treatment was, in itself, sex-based, and a male-female comparison was not required. The law violated the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Cases, Sex discrimination, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Director liability under the federal securities laws. Executive compensation and corporate governance; an academic perspective
  • Abstracts: Compulsory acquisition under Pt. 6A.2 and its implications for minority shareholders. (Australian competition policy.) (Editorial)
  • Abstracts: Split decisions on citations; judges consider pros and cons of ABA proposal for universal system. A six-month burden on right to trial? Appeal may decide whether sentence can be hiked for failure to plead guilty
  • Abstracts: Business ethics for the new millenium. Work and workplace attitudes on social workers: do they predict organizational reputation?
  • Abstracts: The practical problems of market definition revisited. Authorisation: some issues. The strategic approach to merger enforcement by the ACCC: a comment
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.