Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The practical problems of market definition revisited

Article Abstract:

Use of the Stigler-Sherwin means of analyzing market share has some value in cases brought under Australia's Trade Practices Act 1974, but there are limits to the model's value as well. Price correlations can be relevant to find independent variables and to demonstrate autocorrelation, but causality should not be inferred from price correlation. Analysis should also account for substitute goods and technology change. The Stigler-Sherwin model is used for market definition by delineating the market based on price correlations.

Author: Smith, Rhonda L.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1995
Analysis, Cases, Antitrust law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Authorisation: some issues

Article Abstract:

Australia's process of authorizing mergers to preserve competition under the Trade Practices Act 1974 has been successful but not free of problems. Questions have been raised as to what constitutes a public benefit under the law and whether efficiency gains should be considered. Direct access to the Australian Competition Tribunal has been suggested as a means of resolving these problems, but such access would undermine national competition policy.

Author: Smith, Rhonda L., Grimwade, Timothy P.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
Competition (Economics), Laws, regulations and rules, Powers and duties, Australia. Competition and Consumer Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The strategic approach to merger enforcement by the ACCC: a comment

Article Abstract:

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) adoption of a combined structural and strategic behavior approach to assessing the impact of mergers should be supported. A structural approach, which looks at the market power of the companies mergering, cannot predict in and of itself a merger's impact. Including strategic behavior provides a more consistent basis for assessing impact, especially in oligopolistic markets.

Author: Smith, Rhonda L., Round, David K.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
Research, Models, Acquisitions and mergers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Market share
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Continuing Care Retirement Community as a consumer information issue. Communicating with worried older clients: the impact of "generational diversity."
  • Abstracts: Conservatory and provisional measures in international arbitration: AAA's experience. How to draft an AAA arbitration clause for international business
  • Abstracts: Whodunit? Causal responsibility of utilization review for physicians' decisions, patients' outcomes. Some ethical costs of rationing
  • Abstracts: Intellectual property escrow agreements in international joint ventures. Entertainment on the Internet: First Amendment and copyright issues
  • Abstracts: Private prisons. Collateral consequences of imprisonment for children, communities, and prisoners. Understanding the effects of wrongful imprisonment
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.