Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Whodunit? Causal responsibility of utilization review for physicians' decisions, patients' outcomes

Article Abstract:

A new standard for medical care should be divided between third party payers and physicians when considering responsibility for the outcomes on patients. Insurers use utilization review for cost control and this influences causality in a non-traditional way that makes insurers partly responsible for the medical care delivered to the patient. This question of causality and responsibility is important for litigation purposes.

Author: Morreim, E. Haavi
Publisher: American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Publication Name: Law, Medicine & Health Care
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0277-8459
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Some ethical costs of rationing

Article Abstract:

Rationing of medical service can be reconfigured to include the values of the patient. Four ethical costs include loss of physician loyalty, replacement of qualitative assessment by quantitative measures, a loss of service to the poor and imposition of public standards for individual health values. Oregon's rationing of Medicaid has quantitative problems by a public confusion of rare and common diseases.

Author: Menzel, Paul T.
Publisher: American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Publication Name: Law, Medicine & Health Care
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0277-8459
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Justice, politics and community: expanding access and rationing health services in Oregon

Article Abstract:

The Oregon Plan for rationing of medical services to the poor has sought to expand access to medical care in a fair way. Three aspects of the Plan are that it is not a final solution, it covers more than Medicaid and it is not focused on preventing expensive treatments. The Plan was developed with involvement from public communities and this should be encouraged for public policy.

Author: Garland, Michael J.
Publisher: American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Publication Name: Law, Medicine & Health Care
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0277-8459
Year: 1992
Health aspects, Oregon

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Medical economics, Ethical aspects, Medical ethics, Discrimination in medical care, Medical care discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The constitutional responsibility of Congress for military engagements. The election of Thomas Buergenthal to the International Court of Justice
  • Abstracts: Access, accountability and authority: corruption and the democratic process. Democratic transitions and forms of corruption
  • Abstracts: LBOs, fraudulent transfers revisited. After MCorp, decisions favor regulators. Four recent decisions in the Orange County case attempt to balance state sovereignty interests and the goals of Chapter 9
  • Abstracts: "Palace revolt" by Nevada justices? Members of state high court spar over pace of decisions, chief's fitness. One opinion, two controversies; 2nd Circuit limits copyright protection for software, approves court expert
  • Abstracts: Students already heed the call for service in the public interest
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.