Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Looking back; reflections on a life well-spent

Article Abstract:

Thurgood Marshall is interviewed and reminisces about legal issues which have come before the courts during his career. He feels that his years battling for civil rights started with discussions on the issue at Lincoln University. He was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1967 after an acrimonious confirmation battle with opposition by four senators from the South on the Judiciary Committee. As the Warren Court changed to the Burger and Rehnquist courts, he found himself dissenting more. He opposes the school of thought that tries to interpret the constitution by its original intent.

Author: Hengstler, Gary A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Judges, Interview, Marshall, Thurgood

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In political year, ABA policies are something to talk about

Article Abstract:

The perception of the ABA as a political organization is rife despite its making no ccampaign contributions, campaign endorsements, and issuing no ratings of congressional members. Roberta Cooper Ramo, the 1995-96 ABA president, defended the organization at a May 1996 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. She stressed that the organization abstains from partisan politics and stated that a lack of agreement on what defined a matter as 'political' was the problem. Whether ABA policy positions influenced the evaluation of judicial nominees was also addressed.

Author: Hengstler, Gary A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
United States, Political activity, Investigations, Political aspects, Judicial selection, A.B.A., United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How judges view retrial of L.A. cops

Article Abstract:

The Gallup Organization conducted a survey of 401 judges to ascertain their views of the federal trial of four Los Angeles policemen for violating Rodney King's civil rights as a double jeopardy violation. Some 62% felt the second trial did not amount to double jeopardy. A similar percentage felt that Rodney King's testimony was a factor in the second trial's guilty verdicts. The judges were also questioned about other issues such as the impact of the jury's racial makeup in the first trial.

Author: Hengstler, Gary A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Analysis, Police, Complaints (Civil procedure), Discrimination in criminal justice administration, Criminal justice discrimination, Double jeopardy, Police misconduct

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Rethinking cyberspace jurisdiction in intellectual property displays. (National) trademark laws and the (non-national) domain name system
  • Abstracts: Report: closing law ineffective. Prosecutors pinning hopes on trial No. 3. The ABA responds to Quayle
  • Abstracts: A shingle in cyberspace; lawyers online find clients - and some risks
  • Abstracts: Enough, already? Defense attorneys complain about multiple retrials. The revolving door; hiring big political guns can sometimes be a risky proposition
  • Abstracts: Enough, already? Defense attorneys complain about multiple retrials. part 2 Left speechless; out of court, defense lawyers feel a chilling breeze
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.