Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Medical rationing and the allocation of adjudicatory responsibility under comprehensive health care reform in the 103rd Congress: an administrative lawyer's postmortem

Article Abstract:

The debate over health care reform in the 103rd Congress included some recognition of the role of administrative agencies, but contained fundamental flaws in addressing these agencies. A federal benefits package would have been created under the Clinton proposal, but Congress sought to deny the creation of a federal agency to determine these benefits, as well as relevant compliance issues. This lack of a federal agency would have placed the burden of deciding benefits on the federal courts, probably to no one's satisfaction.

Author: Payton, Sallyanne
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995
National health insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Behind the veil where the action is: private policy making and American health care

Article Abstract:

Health care consumers are chiefly concerned with the coverage of services and quality of care, not with access to information, utilization review, or mandated grievance procedures. Consumers can thus best be protected through sound publicized policies that set the content and quality of health care services in health care plans. Private processes for coverage and care should therefore receive emphasis. Many phenomena mark the importance of private processes to the health of Americans.

Author: Kinney, Eleanor D.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1999
United States, Planning, Evaluation, Medical policy, Health policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rule and policy making under health care reform

Article Abstract:

Any reform of the health care system will necessarily involve administrative agencies at the state and federal levels, and it is important that these agencies seek public input in addressing health care reform management. Public input would lessen the chances of legal challenges to the ultimate plan by industry and individuals. The processes and rules of administrative regulation-making are discussed as they would affect health care reform.

Author: Kinney, Eleanor D.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995
Prevention, Administrative procedure, Judicial review of administrative acts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Management, Powers and duties, Health care reform, Administrative agencies, Government agencies
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Can corporate social responsibility be legislated? Taking the initiative on stakeholder rights. Quick feet and nimble minds
  • Abstracts: Giving the articles of association their legal effect: some interesting comments from the High Court of Australia
  • Abstracts: Judicial review of procedural compliance. More on direct final rulemaking: streamlining, not corner-cutting. Preventive medicine
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.