Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Methods of forest law-making

Article Abstract:

US states have a variety of tools for affecting forestry management by private owners, falling into the categories of direct regulation, incentives and disincentives, and encouraging voluntary measures. Direct regulation and incentives are the most common, with more recent regulations expanding beyond reforestation to contemplate other environmental protections. Tax incentives are popular, but disincentives remain underused. Future emphasis will lie on recreational and aesthetic uses, and nonregulatory means.

Author: Lundmark, Thomas
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1995
United States, Remedies, Protection and preservation, Forest reserves, Forestry law, Forest law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Making Washington Work

Article Abstract:

The vast machinery that is commonly known as the federal government must be understood in order to make Washington work. Twelve 'working' principles are identified. For example, 'perception is reality to the government' indicates how important is it to convey the right image. Sadly, too many politicians think first of their survival and lastly of national survival. The two imported forces of national priority are government and business. How these elements interrelate affect everyone.

Author: Loevinger, L.
Publisher: Directors and Boards
Publication Name: Directors & Boards
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9156
Year: 1984
Management, Business, Laws, regulations and rules, National government, Washington, D.C., Cost and standard of living, Cost of living, Federal government

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The open door: will the right to die survive Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill?

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's Glucksberg and Quill opinions paved the way for an 'open door' as regards the issue of physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. Individuals accused of engaging in the practice can simply petition the courts to evaluate their individual circumstances for proof that the State's legitimate interests in a blanket prohibition do not apply to themselves personally. The Court's seeming ambivalence inevitably allows each individual state to judge at their own discretion.

Author: Cohen, Adam J.
Publisher: William S. Hein & Co., Inc.
Publication Name: In the Public Interest
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0148-7531
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Cases, Assisted suicide, Ethical aspects, Medical ethics, Right to die, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Drug testing and the right to privacy: arguing the ethics of workplace drug testing. Ethics in the workplace: an effective tool to combat employee theft
  • Abstracts: Breast Implants: The Cost of Vanity. Insurer liable for cost containment program: Wilson v. Blue Cross of Southern California
  • Abstracts: CDC expands definition of AIDS; more new cases expected. The right of access to child custody and dependency cases
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.