Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

More hospitals eye conversion to taxable status; the benefits of access to equity markets and physicians' capital may outweigh new tax liability

Article Abstract:

Conversion to taxable status might make economic sense in an era when health costs are ballooning and the field has become a buyers' market. Taxable status will let a hospital obtain equity capital and give it real financial integration with physicians. Other advantages include a growth in employee incentives and the chance to achieve improvements in operational efficiency. These advantages may outweigh the taxable which would be levied and the charitable contributions received. The financial, political and legal issues for a hospital thinking of converting are listed.

Author: Zinkham, Robert, Jennings, Marian C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Union activity inside hospitals may be limited; the law restricts solicitation to areas away from patient care

Article Abstract:

Hospitals' union solicitation rules can be more restrictive than those of other employers. The NLRB permits a ban on solicitation during working hours in patient care areas since this might interfere with the quiet needed by patients for recovery. Federal courts have defined patient care areas in various ways, however, hospitals are almost never obliged to permit union organizers who are not employees on their property. Whatever decision hospitals make about solicitation, they should be uniform in the application of their rules.

Author: Cultice, Peter N.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Labor unions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Filing disability claims may preclude lawsuits: in some jurisdictions, courts do not allow plaintiffs who apply for benefits to sue under the ADA

Article Abstract:

Courts disagree on whether filing for disability benefits bars ex-employees from suing the former employer, or a potential employer, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Some courts have agreed with employers that the individual's claim, in applying for benefits, to be totally disabled, is grounds for dismissal. Other courts believe such dismissal would violate the intent of the ADA, and that receipt of disability benefits need not mean the individual is incapable of useful work.

Author: Cultice, Peter N.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Disabled persons, Disability insurance, Actions and defenses, Litigation, Estoppel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Hospitals, Hospital administration, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: IRS calling; don't worry, maybe it's not an audit. Take shelter; enjoying the benefits of pension and profit-sharing plans
  • Abstracts: Positive rights and state constitutions: the limits of federal rationality review. Interpretation and authority in state constitutionalism
  • Abstracts: Recent cases reinforce a client's right to receive accurate information about a case so that the risks of litigation and the value of settlement can be evaluated
  • Abstracts: Corporate introspection in the nineties: "to thine own self be true." Personal trading by portfolio managers revisited: the Institute's recommendations a year later
  • Abstracts: An overview of federal medical savings accounts. Supreme Court unanimously decides employer may amend overfunded, contributory defined benefit plan despite employees' class action arguing the amendment was improper
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.