Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

More than the law; ancillary business growth continues

Article Abstract:

The debate over, and growth of, ancillary businesses of legal firms continues. In Aug 1991, the ABA adopted Model Rule of Professional Conduct 5.7, which allows in-house ancillaries, supervised by attorneys, in conjunction with legal representation. The rule, an attempt at addressing conflicts of interest and other concerns, is unpopular with some practitioners, who feel it will hinder their ancillaries. Advocates of the rule say that if lawyers don't regulate themselves, the government will. A few high-profile cases involving ancillaries have helped fuel the controversy.

Author: Goldberg, Stephanie B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Management, Multidisciplinary law firms, Ethical aspects, Diversification in industry, Industrial diversification

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Ide agenda; seeking "nothing short of revolution." (1993-94 A.B.A. president R. William Ide III)

Article Abstract:

R. William Ide III, 1993-94 ABA president, spoke in his new capacity at the 1993 annual meeting and urged lawyers to work with the public in identifying reasons for public dissatisfaction with the judicial system as well as possible solutions. Ide mentioned efforts under way to improve attorney-client relations. He also called on the ABA to help develop solutions for social problems such as inadequate housing, health care and education.

Author: Goldberg, Stephanie B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Planning, Bar associations, A.B.A., Ide, R. William III

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


New Cal test

Article Abstract:

The California Supreme Court has replaced the 'but-for' test for proximate cause in personal injury suits with a 'substantial factor' test. The court's Dec 9, 1991 decision in Mitchell v Gonzales holds that the 'but-for' test is too confusing for juries. The new test hinges on whether the negligence was a 'substantial factor' in the accident, and is, in the court's opinion, more easily understood by the layman.

Author: Goldberg, Stephanie B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Cases, Personal injuries, Proximate cause (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Women take the bar group helm; gains continue at state and local levels. State bars try reform on election
  • Abstracts: Consciousness raising in the land of the rising sun. Business ethics, Eastern style. How Westinghouse let another one get away
  • Abstracts: Tampering with evidence; the liability and competitiveness myth. Navigating the shoals; Whitewater counsel denies conflicts, admits job a liability
  • Abstracts: Taking the blame; accepting responsibility makes a difference. Using a business record; a document that's inadmissible one way can still get in
  • Abstracts: Sterilization ordered for child abuser; from Tennessee to Texas, judges order procedure when defendants volunteer
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.