Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Motor vehicle policy - assured to take all reasonable steps to safeguard a vehicle

Article Abstract:

The High Court of New Zealand in Turanga v State Insurance ruled on the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance policy condition requiring the assured to take reasonable steps to safeguard the vehicle. In this case, the keys were left hidden in a van and it was stolen. The judge ruled that loss due to negligence of the assured was covered by the policy, and that in this case the assured's attempts to hide the keys along with other circumstances constituted reasonable conduct.

Author: Sutton, Kenneth
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
Automobile insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hampson & ors Syndicate 1204 v. Mining Technologies Australia Pty. Ltd

Article Abstract:

The Queensland Court of Appeal ruled in Hampson Syndicate 1204 v. Mining Technologies Australia Pty. that an insurer was liable for partial loss expenses under their policy to the mining company. The case involved mining equipment buried in a shaft collapse and the cost of trying to retrieve it. The court ruled that the insurer was not beyond the scope of the policy's indemnity and the company ws entitled to recover retrieval costs.

Author: Sutton, Kenneth
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
Interpretation and construction, Insurance, Insurance policies, Indemnity against liability, Liability indemnity, Queensland, Australia, Recoveries (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Claim under professional indemnity policy

Article Abstract:

An insurer's claim of misrepresentation and non-disclosure of a potential claim against an accounting firm was denied in Hendry Rae v FAI General Insurance Co. The Western Australia Supreme Court held for the insured, stating that misrepresentation was irrelevant to the insurance policy for professional liability that the firm had with the insurer.

Author: Sutton, Kenneth
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
Tort liability, Malpractice insurance, Tort liability of insurance companies, Insurance companies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Protection plan; insurance can give important safeguard against employee claims. Home work problems; employers must address liabilities of telecommuting
  • Abstracts: DOL determines welfare plan of employee leasing company is MEWA subject to state regulation. Congress considers MEWA legislation
  • Abstracts: Age suits allowed to proceed; keeping severance ok'd. The disaffected leave the ABA; new bar group to form?
  • Abstracts: Agencies are blinded by science; biotechnology. Public electric utilities will vie under new rules; under the FERC proposal, utilities will be able to sell to customers in other states
  • Abstracts: Professor's study of tort system finds no 'litigation explosion.' (Michael J. Saks of University of Iowa College of Law)
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.