Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Negligence as an exception to the forgery doctrine: when does it exist?

Article Abstract:

The rule that the person whose name is signed has no liability with respect to a forged instrument is not absolute. UCC 3-406 provides the most frequently used exception to the rule, liability for a person whose negligence causes a forgery to be put in circulation. The aggrieved party can use the doctrine of estoppel if successful in proving that the drawer was negligent. Business practices which qualify as negligence include improper signing or certification of the instrument, negligent delivery and improper signing of the instrument.

Author: Norwood, John M.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-672X
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Negligence, Forgery

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hidden liens: who is entitled to what?

Article Abstract:

Hidden liens must be considered by attorneys charged with protecting their clients' interests in a bankruptcy proceeding. Hidden liens refer to unforeseen claims. Hidden liens can arise under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act and Packers and Stockyards Act. Attorneys should also be concerned with mechanics' liens, environmental liens, tax liens, and maritime liens. Attorneys should create checklists that account for possible hidden liens in a bankruptcy proceeding.

Author: Borges, Wanda
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1998
United States, Bankruptcy Law, Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Liens

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An historical analysis of pre-bankruptcy conversion cases on a circuit-by-circuit basis

Article Abstract:

The US Circuit Courts of Appeals and lower courts have historically inconsistently treated pre-bankruptcy conversions or attempts by debtors to minimize the economic effects of yet-to-be filed bankruptcy proceedings. Such pre-bankruptcy planning is viewed by some as fraud. Uniformity in treatment could be provided by Congress or by the US Supreme Court.

Author: Norwood, John M.
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1998
History, Surveys, Economic conversion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Bankruptcy law, Bankruptcy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Conception, testing, reduction to practice: when is it really on sale? Only obvious variations infringe
  • Abstracts: Allentown Mack: a happy exemplar of the law of unintended consequences? Recent decisions and current issues before the board
  • Abstracts: Consumer dealings. Debt collection and the Trade Practices Act
  • Abstracts: Sundstrand: a case study in transformation of cultural ethics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.