Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

No longer your piece of the rock: the silent reorganization of mutual life insurance firms

Article Abstract:

Mutual life insurance companies' move into capital markets has taken place with little critical scholarly analysis and the move may prove to punish policyholders while enriching fund managers. This change has taken place under states' laws, since the states regulate the insurance industry, a situation many consider the least successful aspect in the market regulation system. The best approach to demutualization is through traditional legal and regulatory processes, not through strong-arm lobbying efforts in state legislators.

Author: Racz, Gregory N.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Insurance industry, Holding companies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"If it suffices to accuse": the reassessment of acquittals

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court, in US v. Watts in 1997, dealt with whether federal judges, in sentencing convicted defendants, could take into account other charges for which the same defendants were acquitted. The Court upheld this practice despite criticism that it violated the Double Jeopardy Clause and statutes prohibiting consideration of acquitted conduct. At a deeper level, the Court's ruling disregarded the social effect of acquittals and punishments in communicating of shared beliefs about justice.

Author: Joh, Elizabeth E.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1999
United States, Acquittals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Exploring collateral consequences: Koon v. United States, third party harm, and departures from Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Article Abstract:

Departures from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines can be based on effects of sentencing on third parties in business as well as in the family. For example, cases in which the defendant's prison sentence would cause his business to fail, resulting in harm to employees, can be considered for downward departure from the Guidelines. A 'collateral consequences' framework is proposed to provide guidance to courts in determining whether a departure is justified.

Author: Racz, Gregory N.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1997
Third parties (Law), Judicial discretion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Sentences (Criminal procedure), Case Note
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Franchise encroachment law. New regulations for Australian franchising. Charting courses in the debate over mandatory earnings claims
  • Abstracts: Why do you think it's yours? An exposition of the jurisprudence underlying the debate between cultural nationalism and cultural internationalism
  • Abstracts: Common personnel practices can destroy the exempt status of salaried employees. Privacy in the workplace
  • Abstracts: Abolition of the presumption of 'doli incapax' and the criminalisation of children
  • Abstracts: Beyond just deserts: sentencing violent and sexual offenders. Selective incapacitation after the Criminal Justice Act 1991: a proportional response to protecting the public?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.