Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

No: the framers had only a simple majority in mind

Article Abstract:

Article I/7 of the US Constitution balances the rights of large and small states and a three-fifths rule upsets this balance, intruding on the powers of the other two branches of government. The framers of the constition considered a simple majority sufficient for the passage of laws. Legislators could require more than a 60% supermajority for selected topics or even all laws. When a chamber of Congress impacts its relationship with other institutions, it is guilty of constitutional violation and more specifically of separation of powers.

Author: Bloch, Susan Low
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Separation of powers, Powers and duties, United States. Congress, Representative government and representation, Representative government, Majorities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Macs and PCs: friends at last; new technology makes Apple/DOS connectivity simple

Article Abstract:

The two main advantages of the Macintosh computer for attorneys are the easy connectivity with operating systems such as DOS, UNIX and Windows and the growing availability of software useful to lawyers. MacLink Plus, SoftPC and Softwindows are examples of software packages facilitating this connectivity. Ready for Trial and TrialMaker are Macintosh software packages particularly useful to trial attorneys. Optix 4.0 is a document-imaging program with several novel features.

Author: Saraceno, David A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Usage, Innovations, Evaluation, Product/Service Evaluation, Connectivity, Apple Macintosh (680X0-based system), MacLinkPlus/PC 5.1 (Data conversion software), SoftPC 3.0 (Terminal emulation software)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Listening to friends of the court

Article Abstract:

A pending amendment to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure should make it easier for amicus curiae briefs to avoid repetition of what the parties have said. The amended rule permits an amicus to file his papers a week after the principal brief is filed, and the amicus brief need not contain all the elements of a party's brief and must not exceed half the length of the principal brief. Amicus briefs can be useful and judges should be open to their help.

Author: Munford, Luther T.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Appellate procedure, Appeals (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Tilting the table? The use of preliminary injunctions. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Development of an HIV research database using Medicaid claims data
  • Abstracts: Timmmberr! How two lawyers and a spotted owl took a cut out of the logging industry
  • Abstracts: AIDS and the insurer's right to rescind the insurance contract
  • Abstracts: At the intersection of bankruptcy and divorce: property division debts under the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994
  • Abstracts: Selecting a jury in federal criminal trials after Batson and McCollum. The admissibility of ultimate issue expert testimony by law enforcement officers in criminal trials
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.