Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

On damages, a jury is difficult to figure; jurors' deliberations rarely are irrational, but group interactions and their desire to compromise often yield surprising results

Article Abstract:

The way jurors figure out damages is by a process of reason which, if understood, lawyers can use to make a damage theory presentation more effective. Research reveals that jurors feel more comfortable with a simple damage theory and are often more likely to use a simple theory in deliberations. Even though they are not informed of workers' compensation and insurance coverage, such considerations sometimes influence the ultimate award. Jurors often cut the amount of damages requested by the plaintiff in half as a tactic for reaching an amount on which they can agree. Pretrial research is sometimes helpful in determining how jurors will evaluate damages.

Author: Davis, David S., Ditges, Helen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Psychological aspects, Evaluation, Damages, Damages (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The future of racial redistricting in voting: Clark v. Calhoun County, Mississippi

Article Abstract:

The Fifth Circuit's findings and the Supreme Court's decision to adopt 'watered-down' strict scrutiny as opposed to strict scrutiny guarantees the continued use of race as a key factor in voter redistricting. The move places a stamp of approval on the use of race-based factors without fear of the district's unconstitutionality. The Clark vs. Calhoun County, MI, case would not have happened had the court utilized a strict scrutiny approach.

Author: Dickerson, Paul H.
Publisher: William S. Hein & Co., Inc.
Publication Name: In the Public Interest
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0148-7531
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Election districts, Apportionment (Election law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Empty votes in jury deliberations

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the U.S. Supreme Court-sanctioned system of majority rule in jury deliberations and the social, psychological, and political influence of race and gender on that system.

Author: Taylor-Thompson, Kim
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
United States, Women, Majorities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Jury members, Social aspects, Race
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Public deliberation, affirmative action, and the Supreme Court. Who measures the chancellor's foot? The inherent remedial authority of the federal courts
  • Abstracts: The political economy of a bilateral investment treaty. International relations theory, international law, and the regime governing atrocities in internal conflicts
  • Abstracts: Giving back: an examination of the philanthropic motivations, orientations and activities of large black-owned businesses
  • Abstracts: The economic implications of international secured transactions law reform: a case study. Solving the Latin American sovereign debt crisis
  • Abstracts: The economic implications of international secured transactions law reform: a case study. part 2 All together now? The quest for international accounting standards
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.