Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Organic and mechanical metaphors in late eighteenth-century American political thought

Article Abstract:

Metaphors of the body and the machine both functioned in the political discourse in late 18th century America to describe systems of interrelated parts. Historians have oversimplified the use of these metaphors by associating the organic with 17th century England and the mechanical with 18th century America. The two metaphors did not function in opposition to one another but were more complexly interrelated. Organic and mechanical metaphors for political institutions and the state should be seen as a single paradigm suggesting the balancing that occurs in such systems.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1997
History, Political aspects, 18th century AD, United States history, Political science, Metaphor

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"Lit. theory" put to the test: a comparative literary analysis of American judicial tests and French judicial discourse

Article Abstract:

The heuristic dichotomy fundamental to 20th century legal analysis that formalism is balanced against policy concerns influences not only judicial decisionmaking but also judicial self-analysis and comparative law analysis. Application of the dichotomy results in assessments that judicial jurisprudence is both socially responsive and a source of stability. French judicial decisions evidence the use of the same heuristic devise as that of common law jurists in the US.

Author: Lasser, Mitchel de S.O.-l'E.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, France, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Justice, Administration of, Administration of justice, Law, Comparative analysis, Literature, Judicial process, Law and literature, Comparative law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Xenophilia in American courts

Article Abstract:

A statistical study indicates foreigners win more of their cases than domestic defendants or plaintiffs, because foreigners' fear of US courts leads them to pursue judgment only in strong cases. Widespread xenophilia in American courts is a myth, despite the prevailing opposite perception. If they continue to be as selective in choosing cases to pursue fully, foreigners have little to fear from litigation in US courts.

Author: Clermont, Kevin M., Eisenberg, Theodore
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Social aspects, Research, Cases, Statistics, Aliens, Right to fair and impartial trial, Fair trial, Xenophobia, Judicial statistics, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Fusion and the associational rights of minor political parties. Treaty-based rights and remedies of individuals
  • Abstracts: Separate and equal: in a racially divided America, minorities have to empower their own futures
  • Abstracts: Litigation and settlement under the English and American rules: theory and evidence. Enforcement costs and the optimal magnitude and probability of fines
  • Abstracts: Extraterritorial application of Title VII to American employees abroad. Should the Fair Labor Standards Act enjoy extraterritorial application? A look at the unique case of flags of convenience
  • Abstracts: Law and nature collide; because animal clones are natural products, patenting them can get a little woolly. Laws that bar natural medicine defy nature
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.