Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

PBGC proposes regulations implementing RPA participant notice requirements for underfunded plans

Article Abstract:

The US Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) has issued proposed regulations interpreting the notice requirements for unfunded pension plans enacted in the Retirement Protection Act of 1994. The law generally requires that plan administrators give notice to beneficiaries and participants of a plan's unfunded status and of the limitations of PBGC protections. The PBGC regulations identify how such notice should be made in addition to noting exceptions for small plans and plans meeting deficit reduction contribution requirements.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


PBGC issues final rule on 1997 maximum guaranteeable benefit; proposes rule change on disclosure of premium-related information

Article Abstract:

The US Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's Benefits Payable in Terminated Single Employer Plans regulations have been amended to identify the maximum monthly benefits that can be paid on plans terminated in 1997. The benefit limitation formula established by section 4022(b) of ERISA results in a maximum monthly benefit of $2,761.36 per month for 1997. The amendments also provide for information filings by plan administrators detailing premium payment records.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1997
Pension Fund Termination, Standards, Financial management, Information returns, United States. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


PBGC wins $120 million from company whose principal purpose for seling subsidiaries was evading underfunded pension liability

Article Abstract:

This article concerns a case decided by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania where the court found that sham transactions were conducted by an employer for the purpose of evading pension liabilities. In Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. White Consolidated Industries, the court applied subjective and objective tests to ultimately find the employer liable for $120 million in underfunded pension liabilities.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1999
United States, Employee Benefits & Services, Liabilities (Accounting), Cases, Investigations, Human resource management, Employee benefits, Business sale

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Finance, Pension funds, Pension plan termination insurance
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: IRS proposes regulations on VEBA geographic locale requirement. Termination of employee-funded VEBA does not result in UBTI; distributions to participants taxable only to the extent they exceed their contributions
  • Abstracts: PBGC releases semiannual regulatory agenda. PBGC issues guidance for single-employer plans
  • Abstracts: As the judges see it, they are unwilling participants in a futile and unjust system. The club still retains a men's grill. A sign outside its door says 'gentlemen only.'
  • Abstracts: Waco tragedy spawns litigation. Implants for men under fire
  • Abstracts: Administrator abused discretion in paying benefits to non-spouse solely on participant's statement that spouse could not be located
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.