Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Patent protection provides long-term Net strategy; 'State Street' allows start-ups to protect business methods and defend marketing niches

Article Abstract:

The article discusses State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., a 1998 ruling of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which made patents on methods of doing business possible and denounced the long-held business-method exception to patentability. Electronic commerce companies stand to benefit the most, as before State Street they had only trade secret laws to protect their business methods, and trade-secret protections were often not enough because of reverse engineering.

Author: Maier, Gregory J., Lytle, Bradley D., Ditthavong, Keth
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Electronic commerce, E-commerce, Intellectual property

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


It's too soon to tell if PLI can reduce disputes; pollution liability insurance, meant to fill CGL gaps, has only recently come to prominence

Article Abstract:

Pollution liability insurance (PLI) law is relatively undeveloped but tends to indicate that disputes resemble those surrounding comprehensive general liability insurance of environmental liabilities. Case law indicates significant differences between PLI property damage and cleanup-cost coverage. Other important points include the onset of the contamination claimed for and other liability insurance owned.

Author: Landow-Esser, Janine, Mostow, Michael S.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Pollution liability insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Liability; in-house risks

Article Abstract:

Corporate counsel sometimes face claims under federal and state acts, as well as those claiming fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation or tortious interference with a contract. An employer indemnification agreement will probably not adequately protect the counsel from claims by clients who received pro bono services or legal services from in-house counsel who moonlight.

Author: Fleishman, A. Craig
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Analysis, Corporate counsel, Indemnity against liability, Liability indemnity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: New York's attorney general challenges the affiliation of two hospitals, claiming that their operating agreement is an attempt to fix prices and allocate markets
  • Abstracts: Voluntary mediation in New York State. The pros and cons of mediation
  • Abstracts: Entrenching the duopoly: why the Supreme Court should not allow the states to protect the Democrats and Republicans from political competition
  • Abstracts: Tax treatment; rules for partnerships usually apply; ventures can be structured so as to optimally address several regulatory and control issues
  • Abstracts: Public-private partnership as a strategy for crime control: corporate citizenship makes the difference. Verity's Truth Center for Enlightened Business
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.