Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Perot's lawyer isn't shy about battling party bigs

Article Abstract:

Ross Perot's lawyer, Jamin B. Raskin, an advocate of using the Constitution against underrepresentation in government, usually fights for racial minorities but in trying to get Perot included in the presidential debates is fighting for a political minority. Experts agree that the Perot case's biggest legal difficulty is the status of the Commission on Presidential Elections, which excluded Perot from the debates, as a private, nonprofit group rather than a governmental body. Raskin's suit argues that the commission violated Perot's First Amendment rights and a Federal Election Commission regulation.

Author: Lavelle, Marianne
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Political activity, Attorneys, Practice, Legal specialization, Perot, H. Ross, Raskin, Jamin B.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Lawyer-lobbyist dispute ignites ethics imbroglio

Article Abstract:

A New York Times story on the involvement of lawyers with Hunton & Williams in drafting legislation for congressional Republicans and in briefing staffers has raised concerns and launched an ethics debate. As a result, the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed for at least a month its vote, originally scheduled for Mar 30, 1995, on applying cost-benefits tests to new regulations. The ABA also has asked its executive committee to review the group's guidelines for members representing it.

Author: Lavelle, Marianne
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Political aspects, Ethical aspects, Conflict of interests (Attorneys), Conflicts of interest (Lawyers), Lobbying, Hunton and Williams

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Bending the rules; project letsl companies achieve pollution goals by 'breaking the law.'

Article Abstract:

The Environmental Protection Agency's Project XL seeks to provide companies incentives for being good environmental citizens. The project lifts some of environmental regulation from businesses if businesses show they can manage hazardous substances on their own. According to the EPA, citizen suits cannot be brought against Project XL companies. Intel Corp. was one of the first companies accepted into the project.

Author: Lavelle, Marianne
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Management, Innovations, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Industrial wastes, Hazardous wastes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Outcomes without trials: Supreme Court decisions add to rules on out-of-court case resolutions. Holding the center; Sandra O'Connor evolves into major force on Supreme Court
  • Abstracts: Premerger reporting; notification rules are complex; failure to navigate overlapping national rules when negotiating a merger may scuttle the deal
  • Abstracts: Agency authority to define the scope of private rights of action. Seven ways to deossify agency rulemaking
  • Abstracts: The U.S. Supreme Court will settle a circuit court split over whether punitive damages may be awarded in securities arbitrations governed by New York law
  • Abstracts: Software left unprotected; in keeping with recent trends, the 1st Circuit limits copyrightability of computer programs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.