Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Poisoned fruit: quest continues for a consistent rule on searches following traffic stops

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled on the validity of automobile searches in two Oct 1994 cases, United States v. Perez and United States v. Millan. Both defendants argued that the traffic stops which occasioned the searches were pretexts, that the officers had no probable cause to suspect there was anything illegal in the cars and that the searches were nonconsensual. In Perez, the 9th Circuit upheld the lower court's conviction, while in Millan the court reversed the defendant's conviction, agreeing that the traffic stop was a pretext and that the evidence could not be used.

Author: Podgers, James
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Searches and seizures, Automobile, Vehicle searches

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Free speech in the new downtowns: courts seek to identify new public forums under the First Amendment

Article Abstract:

Two recent cases help clarify the role of private forums that monopolize public space in relation to free speech. The NJ Supreme Court ruled in Jan that malls have at least some obligation to permit free speech as they have gone to considerable effort to replace the previously existing public forums. The ruling reversed a lower court. The 7th Circuit has also ruled that, despite the US Supreme Court's ruling in 1992 that airport terminals are not public forums, some regions within those terminals may be.

Author: Podgers, James
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
United States, Analysis, Freedom of speech, Shopping centers, Public forum doctrine (Law), Central business districts, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Maine route; multi-door proposal reflects growing role of ADR

Article Abstract:

The new ABA Section of Dispute Resolution is another link in the group's continuing interest in alternative dispute resolution (ADR). This interest started in 1983 with the Multi-Door Resolution Centers Courthouse Project, which offered multiple options to parties seeking dispute resolution. Although the pilot project showed ADR to be effective, few jurisdictions have adopted the multi-door project's comprehensive approach, which the new ABA section will continue to advocate.

Author: Podgers, James
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Management, Planning, Dispute resolution (Law), A.B.A. Section of Dispute Resolution

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Counsel in Marvel case knocked out; Del. court adopts strict rule on debtor-creditor conflicts. Lawyer indicted in sting
  • Abstracts: Lawyers need not be contingent-fee villains. 'Tis the season to be listful. Your right to counsel threatened
  • Abstracts: Service asserts continued vitality of old Revenue Ruling but will not penalize consistent good-faith contrary positions
  • Abstracts: Compulsory acquisition under Pt. 6A.2 and its implications for minority shareholders. (Australian competition policy.) (Editorial)
  • Abstracts: Clinton unveils appeals process in wetlands policy. She implements Clinton's policy supporting banks. Coalition wants state moratorium on 'Net tax
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.