Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Pre-2000 Y2K class actions not getting far; class actions for Y2K claims have difficult hurdles to overcome. Courts and Congress must soon decide how to handle them

Article Abstract:

Court rulings on the liability of the computer and software industries for the Y2K problem and, in particular, whether class actions are suited to claimants' pressing for such accountability will emerge from cases filed since the Y2K problem became news. Approximately 50 Y2K class actions have been filed in state and federal courts, but few have been certified as class actions. Congress has taken a step toward curbing class actions with the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act.

Author: Moss, Richard L., Lipsitz, Randy
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Year 2000 transition (Computers)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Class claims arise under the FLSA; as Title VII class actions draw judicial scrutiny, plaintiffs turn to the Fair Labor Standards Act as a new vehicle for suits

Article Abstract:

Class action claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) are governed by Section 16(b) of that Act, meaning that opt-in classes with similarly situated plaintiffs are the only possibility , and the lead plaintiff can obtain notice to potential class members more easily than in a Rule 23 class case. The appeal of FLSA class action cases is the high possibility of common issues.

Author: Walker, Samuel D., Fortney, David S.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Complex litigation; punitive damages class II

Article Abstract:

The response claims a disagreement with Linda S. Mullenix's interpretation of the law of punitive damages in class actions. Lack of evidentiary presentation rather than legal barriers causes plaintiffs to fail to establish limited fund certification. Litigants should remember what qualifies as persuasive evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 23(b).

Author: Sobol, Thomas M., Cabraser, Elizabeth J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Criticism and interpretation, Exemplary damages, Punitive damages, Mullenix, Linda S.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Usage, Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Dangerous dedication; studies suggest long hours, productivity pressures can cause serious health problems and a higher suicide rate for attorneys
  • Abstracts: Social responsibility and the marketing educator: a focus on stakeholders ethical theories, and related codes of ethics
  • Abstracts: Market volatility will affect merger negotiations. Insurance is available for pharmaceutical recalls; CGL and all-risk policies should together cover third-party liabilities and first-party costs
  • Abstracts: Staking an Internet claim; the rush to grab a site name has led to new rules, but no one to enforce them. .Com-mentary on domain names; state bars keep a watchful eye on content of lawyers' Internet IDs
  • Abstracts: Winning the verdict with videos and virtual reality; many traditional forms of evidence are not yet obsolete, but litigators are relying on technology to persuade the jury
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.