Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Proving ADA discrimination: the Courts' view

Article Abstract:

Various forms of discrimination under Title VII and other statutes dictate different methods of proving discrimination, and discrimination suits under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are no exception. ADA actions do fit reasonably well into the framework set forth by the US Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green. The elements of an ADA prima facie case include showing that the plaintiff is within the protected class, that the plaintiff met qualifications for the job, that the plaintiff was rejected for the job or promotion and that the employer still sought applicants.

Author: Greenlaw, Paul S., Kohl, John P.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1996
Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Proving Title VII religious discrimination

Article Abstract:

Employment discrimination based on religion is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The employer must make a reasonable accommodation to the employee's religious belief when it conflicts with an employment requirement. What constitutes reasonable accommodation is decided on a case-by-case basis. Seniority systems, standards of undue hardship, de minimis cost and cases involving religious hardship are also discussed. The U.S. Supreme Court case of Trans World Airlines v. Hardison has been important in delineating reasonable accommodation and undue hardship.

Author: Greenlaw, Paul S., Kohl, John P.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
Freedom of religion, Religious aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Proving Title VII sexual harassment: the courts' view

Article Abstract:

Sexual harassment claims are of two kinds: denial of tangible aspects of a position, such as raises, or a work environment so hostile that it constitutes harassment. Evidence for a sexual harassment claim can be broken down into five parts. First, the employee must be a member of a protected group; second, the harassment must be unwelcome; third and fourth, the harassment was sexual in nature and related to tangible job benefits; fifth, the harassment was the employer's liability. Hostile environment harassment is more difficult to prove.

Author: Greenlaw, Paul S., Kohl, John P.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1992
Testimony, Sexual harassment, Sex discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Screen tests; critics view resume-scanning software as newest form of employment discrimination. All aboard for MDP train; but accounting giant's financing of D.C. law firm could still derail
  • Abstracts: Taping raises legal, practical questions. Age discrimination.`. Employment law; use and misuse of statistics
  • Abstracts: Criminal law; independent counsel. Criminal law; self-incrimination. Grand jury secrecy
  • Abstracts: 10 innovative tort claims; the NLJ identifies promising modified or new causes of action. Six new ways to win: emerging causes of action: 2001
  • Abstracts: Preparing witnesses for depositions; the most important trip to the woodshed. Witness profiles: be observant of characteristics that will appeal to jurors or turn them off
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.