Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Pursuing domain name registrants can backfire; in domain name disputes, NSI tends to side with challengers, but federal courts can reverse

Article Abstract:

Domain name disputes are heard either in federal district courts or in the administrative court run by Network Solutions (NSI) Inc, and there is a wide range of outcomes, with the NSI tending to side with a domain name challenger and against its customer, regardless of the actual merits of the challenge. A domain name owner willing to overcome this initial challenge can find a court willing to consider the challenge on its merits.

Author: Oppedahl, Carl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Internet, Powers and duties, Network Solutions Inc. (Herndon, Virginia), NSOL

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Domain-name registrants have new rules to follow; uniform domain name dispute resolution policy provides for new procedures and remedies

Article Abstract:

The Uniform Domain name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is discussed and, as of Jan 3, 2000, applies to all domain names in existence or subsequently registered. The UDRP recognizes that the registrar of domain names is not the appropriate party to determine the parties' right and the equities between them, although it is premised on the consideration of such rights.

Author: Adler, Kenneth A., Gilbert, Robert D., Crane, Susan L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Proceedings under UDRP are off and running; already, 120 decisions have issued under Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy

Article Abstract:

Issues regarding the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy are discussed. The complainant has the burden of proof on three issues, whether the mark is at least confusingly similar to a mark in which the complainant has rights, why the domain name holder has no legitimate interests in the right, and why this domain name has been registered or used in bad faith.

Author: Benjamin, Amy
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Trademarks

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Domain names, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: New domain name regimes may be doomed by disarray, discord. National laws entangle the 'Net: it's a small, small litigious Web
  • Abstracts: Preparing to move into the digital era. Cashing in his chips to be with his family. California's sunny economy is growing partners; San Francisco Bay area firms are elevating more to partner as work is booming
  • Abstracts: Drawing a line in the sand; suits by lifeguard, student to define standard for sexual harassment liability. Changing rules on the job; new sex harassment standards please bosses and workers
  • Abstracts: Business ethics in Spain. Ethics in finance and public policy: the Ibercorp case
  • Abstracts: Comments on Stephen Carter's lecture. Religious freedom as if religion matters: a tribute to Justice Brennan. The religion clauses and Justice Brennan in full
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.