Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Queen City Pizza: bad law for franchisees

Article Abstract:

The United States Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit ruled in Queen City Pizza v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. that the ongoing relationship between a business format franchisor and its franchisees was immune from antitrust scrutiny. The approach taken by the court is an incorrect interpretation of the Supreme Court's decision in the Kodak case. Kodak required discovery so plaintiffs could produce evidence of market realities which, if produced, should have entitled them to a jury trial.

Author: Smith, Diane Green
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1998
Management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts stress importance of clear clauses; recent decisions have held that the intent of parties to be bound by or supersede arbitration clauses must be spelled out

Article Abstract:

The prevailing view that arbitration clauses are effective without a showing of clear evidence of intent to supercede has been challenged by recent state and federal court decisions. These hold that the clauses fail for lack of specificity with respect to any number of elements including intent, duration, bindable parties, and evidentiary procedures.

Author: Knuti, Robert A., Michaels, Jan M., Vocke, Damon N.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Contract Administration, Laws, regulations and rules, Arbitration (Administrative law), Administrative arbitration, Contract management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Protecting franchisees from abusive arbitration clauses

Article Abstract:

The author outlines legal arguments available to franchisees to defeat arbitration clauses that aim to achieve ends that would not be permissible in litigation. Topics include the current use of arbitration clauses and the use of mandatory arbitration by employers and commercial firms.

Author: Sternlight, Jean R.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 2000
United States, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Franchises, Interpretation and construction, Commercial arbitration agreements
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: 2d Circuit bars suits by 'offshore' corporations; decision precludes Hong Kong, Caribbean companies from bringing suits in federal court
  • Abstracts: A survey of published, private-sector arbitral decisions. The consent award in labor arbitration: where and why?
  • Abstracts: Circuit courts are split on whether discrimination claims can be compelled to arbitration when collective bargaining agreements include arbitration clauses. part 2
  • Abstracts: No longer your piece of the rock: the silent reorganization of mutual life insurance firms. Exploring collateral consequences: Koon v. United States, third party harm, and departures from Federal Sentencing Guidelines
  • Abstracts: Foreign courts view discovery more narrowly than their U.S. counterparts, giving rise to problems when foreign parties wind up in American courts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.