Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

RTC's receivership powers reviewed

Article Abstract:

The 4th Circuit's decision in Landmark Land Co v Resolution Trust Corp (RTC) shields the agency from any judicial review of its dealings with failed financial institutions. The lower court found no statutory basis for the RTC's claim that the agency's receivership powers took precedence over the court's Bankruptcy Code powers to protect a corporate reorganization. The 4th Circuit sided with the RTC and held that FIRREA overrides the Bankruptcy Code, giving the agency complete control over the assets of failed banks. The issues in this broad ruling are sure to come before the courts again.

Author: Douglas, John L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power), Judicial review of administrative acts, Receivers (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Institutions seek clearer liability test

Article Abstract:

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp's and Resolution Trust Corp's eagerness to sue directors and officers of failed banks is making many qualified people reluctant to serve on bank boards. The agencies could announce that they would stop trying to craft an ordinary negligence standard and just use FIRREA's gross negligence standard. They could also make the business judgment rule which most directors and officers use as a defense more realistic. Even the best-intentioned and qualified directors and officers make occasional mistakes and need not be punished so harshly.

Author: Douglas, John L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Corporate directors, United States. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


As states adopt interstate banking even before federal law goes into effect, holding companies mull consolidating subsidiaries

Article Abstract:

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking Act and other legislative and regulatory developments encourage bank holding companies to consider potential changes. These include consolidating subsidiaries in multiple states into a single bank with interstate branches, taking a decentralized approach, eliminating the holding company, and incorporating thrifts into other operations or keeping them separate. The effects of different state laws and federal attempts to make national bank charters more attractive are discussed.

Author: Douglas, John L., Buchman, John A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Banking Institutions, Depository Credit Intermediation, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS, United States, Banking industry, Management, Banks (Finance), Influence, Interstate banking

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Powers and duties, United States. Resolution Trust Corp., Bank failures
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The exclusive treaty power revisited. Taking treaties less seriously. The United States and its treaties: observance and breach
  • Abstracts: DNA report raises concerns; study backs genetic evidence, but questions reliability of labs, statistics
  • Abstracts: DNA report raises concerns; study backs genetic evidence, but questions reliability of labs, statistics. part 2
  • Abstracts: Federal Circuit clarifies laches defense. Questions persist on security interests
  • Abstracts: New cases re-examine pre-emption; questions persist after the Cipollone ruling. When are science experts really expert? Courts split
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.