Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The exclusive treaty power revisited

Article Abstract:

Approval of the Uruguay Round amendments to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT/WTO) by both the Senate and the House is appropriate because that is the established procedure for trade agreements. There has been some question as to whether the agreement is a treaty requiring approval by two-thirds of the Senate or whether a majority vote of both Houses is more appropriate. However, trade agreements relate to the House's traditional purview over finances as well as to the Senate's role of advice and consent on treaties and thus the bicameral process should be followed.

Author: Vagts, Detlev F.
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1995
Editorial, Analysis, Commercial treaties, Trade agreements, United States. Congress, Treaty-making power, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Taking treaties less seriously

Article Abstract:

The US has demonstrated growing disrespect for international treaties since 1988. The North American Free Trade Agreement provides little recourse to supranational panels to resolve disputes. The US has not paid its UN dues. A 1957 Supreme Court decision stating treaties cannot violate constitutional imperatives was used in a 1998 decision against the Vienna Convention. The US government is also behind schedule in publishing treaties.

Author: Vagts, Detlev F.
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The United States and its treaties: observance and breach

Article Abstract:

The US has been accused of being unwilling to honer treaty obligations. This article concludes that the nation's record in this respect is not as bad as many have claimed. However, the way some Americans have spoken of treaty obligations has led to much suspicion.

Author: Vagts, Detlev F.
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 2001
United States, Evaluation, Laws, regulations and rules, Obligations (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Political aspects, International relations, Treaties
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The adequate consideration requirement relating to sales of employer stock to and from tax-qualified retirement plans
  • Abstracts: Franchisor liability for gender discrimination and sexual misconduct. Fair criticism, cyberlibel, and unlawful coordinated action over the Internet
  • Abstracts: Attorney malpractice in claims handling and settlement strategy: avoiding the road to liability. Punitive damages: an analysis of the states' response to B.M.W. v. Gore
  • Abstracts: Accelerated charitable trusts provide new gift giving opportunities. Planned basis freezes and ESOPs after the 2001 Tax Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.