Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The adequate consideration requirement relating to sales of employer stock to and from tax-qualified retirement plans

Article Abstract:

An adequate consideration exemption exists for transfers of employer's stock between a qualified plan and either the employer or a disqualified person that would otherwise be considered a prohibited transaction. When selling, the plan must receive no less than adequate consideration, and when buying, the plan must pay no more than adequate consideration. The Dept of Labor has released proposed regulations that identify how to value adequate consideration, particularly if the stock is privately held. The regulations identify required components of the appraisal.

Author: Maldonado, Kirk F.
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1997
Evaluation, Consideration (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Trustee not liable for alleged breach of fiduciary duties due to sale and immediate buy-back of ESOP stock

Article Abstract:

The US 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in Herman v. Mercantile Bank, N.A. held that a purchase of stock for adequate consideration was enough to reject the US Labor Dept's (DOL) argument that a former stock ownership plan trustee breached its fiduciary duties to plan participants. The former trustee did not act to prevent or ameliorate harm from the purchase of stock by the successor trustee one day after the former trustee sold that stock to an unrelated third party.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1998
Cases, Fiduciary duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Counting top-hat plan contributions as compensation does not discriminate against NHCEs

Article Abstract:

The IRS in Letter Ruling 9841021 approved an employee stock ownership plan designed pursuant to IRC section 423 as nondiscriminatory. The nonqualified deferred compensation plan was offered only to certain highly compensated employees. Since only cursory analysis supports the IRS's conclusion, the influence of the ruling on other section 423 plans is uncertain.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1999
United States, Pension Funds & Benefit Plans, Pension funds, Employee benefits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Stocks, Employee stock ownership plans, Management
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The changing structure and contents of the employer's legal responsibility for health and safety at work in post-industrial systems
  • Abstracts: The role of industrial relations in achieving social equity: a comparison of labor laws in Australia and the United States
  • Abstracts: COBRA notice and coverage not required of disappearing employer following sale of assets. HCFA issues proposed rules for electronic transactions involving health plan data by health plans health care clearinghouses and health care providers
  • Abstracts: Give and take: public use as due compensation in PruneYard. Liberties, fair values, and constitutional method
  • Abstracts: ESOP used in corporate acquisition was not disqualified, did not engage in prohibited transaction. ESOP disqualified for violating exclusive benefit rule; 99% of assets invested in defaulted participant loans
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.