Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Recalling the papers and the papers

Article Abstract:

The publication of the Pentagon Papers by the Washington Post and the New York Times gave the American people information about the US involvement in Vietnam which the government did not want them to have and spawned a US Supreme Court case. The ruling which came down was for freedom of the press, stating on June 30, 1971, that an injunction would have no meaning since newspaper publication had already given out information damaging to national security. The court's rationale for allowing publication was that the government did not present enough evidence of immediate serious harm, not that it could not make a case for prior restraint.

Author: Garbus, Martin
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Cases, Records and correspondence, National security, United States. Department of Defense, Prior restraint

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Private censorship is uniquely dangerous

Article Abstract:

The V-chip controversy signals potential censorship by private groups, which is much more dangerous than governmental censorship. This is so because the First Amendment is mainly a remedy against governmental intrusion; because learning of private censorship can be a difficult as stopping it; and because private groups are often less able to resist pressure from special interests than the government because of the importance of advertising and customer support. Corporations and advertisers would control television content under a V-chip regime, not parents.

Author: Garbus, Martin, Atlas, David Y.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Political aspects, Television and children, Censorship, V-chip, V-chips

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Keynote address: state of the union for the law of the new millennium, the Internet, and the First Amendment

Article Abstract:

The author examines surveys on how the general US population reacts to the First Amendment, conceptual issues in the modern world involving the First Amendment, and the effects of corporate and media power concentration on what can be seen and learned.

Author: Garbus, Martin
Publisher: Oceana Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 1999
United States, Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Internet, Freedom of speech

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Implications for fisheries management of U.S. acceptance of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea. Mare nostrum: a new international law of the sea
  • Abstracts: HIV education and the law: a critical review. The law and the public's health: a study of infectious disease law in the United States
  • Abstracts: Certain issues of the work of the Sixth Committee at the Fifty-Sixth General Assembly. Handwritten wills may be valid if certain requirements are met
  • Abstracts: Bargaining for privacy in the unionized workplace. Implementing the Information and Consultation Directive in Great Britain: A new voice at work
  • Abstracts: Climate change: The final countdown. The significance of the proposed changes to the waste framework directive
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.