Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Rights in twentieth-century constitutions

Article Abstract:

The US lags behind other developed nations in providing constitutional guarantees of welfare rights. However, welfare rights tend to be regarded as 'programmatic' rather than actually enforceable. Constitutional guarantees do not seem to be strongly correlated with actual social expenditures. In fact, other countries are imitating aspects of the American system that work well, such as the cooperation between government and private organizations and the capacity for innovation provided by federalism. Rights and welfare both depend on the social capital of civic virtue which needs more attention.

Author: Glendon, Mary Ann
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
Comparative analysis, Constitutional law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The politics of women's wrongs and the Bill of "Rights": a bicentennial perspective

Article Abstract:

The Bill of Rights was intended to protect the interests of men of property from the majority who were without property, including women. This bias still operates to support the status quo against reform and to limit the participation of ordinary people, especially women, in politics and government. Women's concerns are excluded by the division between public and private spheres incorporated in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights should be evaluated by its lack of success in fostering political participation and increasing economic and physical security.

Author: Becker, Mary E.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
Social aspects, Laws, regulations and rules, Women

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Bill of Rights: a century of progress

Article Abstract:

Judicial interpretation of the Bill of Rights has shown significant progress over the past 100 years, although Supreme Court decisions in 1991 have begun to narrow its application. Earlier, judicial adoption of the incorporation doctrine under the 14th Amendment significantly expanded the scope of the Bill of Rights. The Framers of the Constitution never intended to produce an exhaustive document like the Napoleonic Code, but rather a general framework which allocated significant decisionmaking power to each branch of government, including the judiciary.

Author: Stevens, John Paul
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
History, Political aspects, Constitutional history

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Civil rights
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The commercial Constitution. The value of seeing things differently: Boerne v. Flores and Congressional enforcement of the Bill of Rights
  • Abstracts: Victim restitution will tie courts into knots. Trade marks, descriptions of origin and the internal market. Confidential commercial information and breach of fiduciary duty - the liability of third parties in knowing receipt to make restitution
  • Abstracts: A Basic Guide to Tax Accounting Opportunities. The Purchase of an Accounting Practice: Making the Right Choice
  • Abstracts: Righting wrongs: towards a new theory of state succession to responsibility for international delicts. The Kantian theory of international law
  • Abstracts: Beyond rape: an essay on the difference between the presence of force and the absence of consent. An offer the Teamsters couldn't refuse: the 1989 consent decree establishing federal oversight and ending mechanisms
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.