Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Section 183 election extends the refund period

Article Abstract:

The Tax Court held that a taxpayer was not barred by the limitations period for refunds because an election under IRS section 183(e)(4) extended the period without the need for formal IRS approval. In this case, which involved a divided opinion among the presiding judges, the court found that the last year of the taxpayer's activity was in 1996. Since the taxpayer had elected the section 183(e)(4) postponement, its provisions automatically extended the period for assessing a deficiency, based on his last year of activity, to 1998. The taxpayer was therefore entitled to refunds which fell within the extended limitations period. Further, for the sake of consistency, the court ruled that the IRS cannot invoke lack of mutuality under IRS section 6501(c)(4) to a refund. The legislative history behind section 183(e)(4) also supported the tax court's conclusion.

Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Practical Tax Strategies
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1999
Tax refunds, Tax returns, United States. Tax Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


District court bars service's employer-only FICA assessment

Article Abstract:

The IRS has lost a case involving the aggregated assessment of an employer's share of the FICA tax due on unreported tips. The 'Quietwater Entertainment' case, which was heard by a district court in the Eleventh Circuit, concerned a taxpayer that owned and operated a restaurant in Florida. The IRS had claimed that the taxpayer had underpaid its employment taxes having used the aggregate method to compute taxes due. The taxpayer, however, argued that the IRS had improperly used an assessment method that was not appropriate for a tipping system that allowed 'tipping out' practices. Citing Section 3121(q), the district court distinguished the circumstances of the case from an earlier Eleventh Circuit case cited by the IRS as a rationale for its deficiency assessment.

Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Practical Tax Strategies
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1999
Eating places, Restaurants & Food Service, Food Services and Drinking Places, Taxation, Restaurants, Tipping

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Tax law, Cases, United States. Internal Revenue Service
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: State aid reform: Some reflections on the need to revise the notice on guarantees. Economic analysis and antitrust damages
  • Abstracts: Consumer dealings. Debt collection and the Trade Practices Act
  • Abstracts: Czech privatization: a criticism of misunderstood liberalism (keynote address). "Alliances - their roots and their fruits." (speech of Council for Ethics in Economics founder and first Pres Paul M. Minus)(Transcript)
  • Abstracts: Lodging complaints about IRS conduct under the new regime. Final regs. trigger increased exposure for exempt organizations
  • Abstracts: The detective, the snout, and the audit commission: the real costs in using informants. Breaking the crime/drugs cycle: the birth of a new approach?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.