Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Securities; class auctions

Article Abstract:

The latest class action decisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) either mandate an auction for the position of lead counsel or have selected multiple lead plaintiffs in a way that places the largest shareholder in a minority position. Neither expense reimbursements nor the legal fee awarded should be subjected to any ceiling, as this would inevitably aggravate the conflict of interests between the plaintiffs' attorney and the class. The strategic information and incentives which the auction procedure gives defendants are another problem.

Author: Coffee, John C., Jr.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Cases, Securities fraud

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


After Kaye Scholer, questions remain

Article Abstract:

The order freezing the assets of the law firm of Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), as a result of alleged misconduct by senior partner Peter M. Fishbein and certain associates, raises questions of authority and constitutionality. The wording of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act is ambiguous in this matter, and the OTS's actions may have been excessive. When the Supreme Court reviews this issue their willingness to observe legislative history may determine the result.

Author: Coffee, John C., Jr.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Legal services, Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Finance, Powers and duties, Banking law, Ex parte procedure, United States. Office of Thrift Supervision, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays and Handler

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


After the high court decision in 'Amchem Products Inc. v. Windsor,' can a class action ever be certified only for the purpose of settlement?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's 1997 Amchem decision may have permanently changed the rules for settling class action lawsuits and certifying classes. The decision mandates that future claimants be independently represented and prohibits a single counsel from making unilateral allocational decisions as tradeoffs in reaching a settlement. Strategies for dealing with the implications of Amchem, and the effect of the decision on subclasses and prior class actions, are also discussed.

Author: Coffee, John C., Jr.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: High court to resolve class action fight; if class can't be certified for suit, can it be for settlement? Indigent defense system KO'd: unconstitutional in La
  • Abstracts: Curbing sexual harassment in the firms. Courts now find same-sex harassment to be actionable, but they vary on the relevance of a defendant's sexual orientation
  • Abstracts: Structuring trusts to permit the donor to act as trustee. Proposed legislation threatens unified credit
  • Abstracts: Parental consent; stringent Miss. law passes muster. On and on; will the new amendments cut Rule 11 litigation down to size?
  • Abstracts: Porn forfeiture stymied; judge bars confiscation of $10 million in assets based on two obscene tapes. Trials suspended in Tyler, Texas; judge cites racial tensions as reason for two-month hiatus
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.