Sexual harassment; state and federal courts decide standards, scope of tort

Article Abstract:

A number of state and federal courts decided cases on sexual harassment in 1993. A San Francisco federal court ruled high schools where hostile environment sexual harassment takes place ineligible to receive federal funds in Patricia H. v. Berkeley Unified School District. The New Jersey Supreme Court decided the reasonable-person-of-the-same-sex standard was appropriate for sexual harassment cases in Lehmann v. Toys 'R' Us, Inc. The Michigan Supreme Court decided a single incident of harassment was enough for a complaint in Radtke v. Everett but declined to use the reasonable woman standard.

Cases, Sexual harassment

---

The British go global: and sometimes head-to-head with Americans

Article Abstract:

British law firms' interest in acquiring an international presence is growing. The five largest London firms maintain offices in Brussels as well as financial centers around the world. These five are Clifford Chance, Linklaters and Paines, Freshfields, Lovell White Durrant and Slaughter and May. Many London firms have formed partnerships with foreign ones using such structures as strategic alliances, networks or affiliation agreements.

United Kingdom, Laws, regulations and rules, Practice, International law

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The power of Congress to limit the jurisdiction of federal courts and the text of Article III. Mental decrepitude on the U.S. Supreme Court: the historical case for the 28th Amendment
• Abstracts: Court's waste-test order helps lenders. Circuit courts split on scope of FIFRA. Cases split on medical-device claim pre-emption; courts differ in applying the test set out in 'Medtronic' to decide if U.S. law pre-empts tort claims
• Abstracts: Why settle for less? Factoring in taxability. Winning and losing: Supreme Court raises questions about taxability of personal injury awards
• Abstracts: Taking the blame; accepting responsibility makes a difference. Using a business record; a document that's inadmissible one way can still get in

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.