Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The power of Congress to limit the jurisdiction of federal courts and the text of Article III

Article Abstract:

Commentators have argued that Congress's authority over the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary is more limited than has been interpreted under the traditional view, but Article III of the Constitution clearly identifies the extent of Congressional power. Those who argue for reduced Congressional encroachment on the federal courts focus on the structure of the Constitution. The Constitution's design is, however, far less precise than Article III. Careful reading of the Constitution reveals that the system of checks and balances involves many incursions on the power of each branch of government.

Author: Harrison, John (British inventor)
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1997
Analysis, Separation of powers, Legislative power, Federal jurisdiction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The lawfulness of the Reconstruction Amendments

Article Abstract:

The author traces the history of the ratification process of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments during the post-Civil War period, and examines legal objections to the process based on the supposed lack of legal governments in many Southern states during the Civil War and Reconstruction.

Author: Harrison, John (British inventor)
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
States, Powers and duties, State government, Sovereignty, Reconstruction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mental decrepitude on the U.S. Supreme Court: the historical case for the 28th Amendment

Article Abstract:

The author outlines the case for adopting a constitutional amendment mandating compulsory retirement for members of the U.S. Supreme Court at age 75. Examples of mental incapacity by Supreme Court Justices from the 1790s through the 1990s are provided.

Author: Garrow, David J.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2000
Psychological aspects, Officials and employees, Judges, United States. Supreme Court, Mandatory retirement

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, History, Constitutional amendments
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The conception that the corporation is a nexus of contracts, and the dual nature of the firm. Measuring the domain of mediating hierarchy: how contestable are U.S. public corprations?
  • Abstracts: The susceptibility of vertical restraints to summary adjudication: procedural avenues to substantive objectives
  • Abstracts: The opinions of the International Court of Justice on the threat or use of nuclear weapons. United Nations governance of postconflict societies
  • Abstracts: 1996 amendments to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act with respect to terrorist activities. The United States and the Statute of Rome
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.