Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Shopping for access after Lechmere

Article Abstract:

Several trends and events affecting public use of private property counter the union-restricting effect of the US Supreme Court decision in Lechmere v NLRB. The latter concerned a private parking lot with a no-solicitation rule that non-employee unionists sought to use to reach non-union employees. The court found, 6-3, that the precedent of NLRB v Babcock and Wilcox outweighed other precedents the NLRB favored. A law in CA and a ruling by NJ's court restrict the private-property rights of mall and shopping center owners.

Author: Boroff, Karen E.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Public forum doctrine (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Unfair labor practice filings in organizing elections - new data and analysis

Article Abstract:

Trade unions file complaints of unfair labor practices against employers in 20% of the union organizing drives conducted under the National Labor Relations Act. A survey covering two presidential appointment periods of the National Labor Relations Board and the hospital industry in different regions confirms these results. The consistency of the rate suggests operational stability in the NLRB. Unfair labor complaint filings and whether these filings had merit did not seem to affect the results of union elections.

Author: Boroff, Karen E.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
Management, Investigations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Distinguishing 'Lechmere': union organizers' access to employers' property

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court Lechmere ruling disheartened union organizers because it seemed to foreclose opportunities to work on employer's property but there are other possibilities. If the employer discriminates, Lechmere does not limit access rights of the non-employee union organizer. Moreover, if the employer does not own the property the union organizer can distribute literature and talk to employers. With the support of pro-union employees of the targeted employer these plans can be successful.

Author: Conlon, Kevin, Voigt, Catherine
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1993
Cases, Right of property, Property rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Labor unions, Unfair labor practices, Unionization
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Florida clarifies enforcement of noncompetes. Choice of law in franchise relationships: staying within bounds
  • Abstracts: Hopwood is bad business for business schools. Has business school education become a scandal? Should there be a Nobel prize in business?
  • Abstracts: A case for variable life. Is variable universal life an appropriate funding vehicle for deferred compensation plans?
  • Abstracts: Helping lawyers cope with new legal market. Helping to protect rights in new technologies. Helping lawyers resolve complex merger issues
  • Abstracts: Confronting likelihood of massive changes. Advising lawyers of cross-border developments. Initiating new rules for ethical business conduct
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.