Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Sides set to fight on tort reform

Article Abstract:

Tort reform battles continue with parties taking sides as signs mount that Pres Bill Clinton might sign a limited but substantive tort reform measure. The White House seems willing to consider tort legislation with four major elements, immunity from products liability suits for companies supplying biomaterials or for retailers simply in the chain of distribution, a damages cap on punitive damages levied against small businesses, and an 18-year statute of repose for durable goods used in the workplace.

Author: Berkman, Harvey
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Tort reform, Public opinion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An agency explains why it switched sides; after winning a reverse-bias award, the U.S. Justice Department argues against it

Article Abstract:

The US Justice Department changed sides in the reverse discrimination case of US v. Piscataway Township Board of Education after winning a reverse discrimination award in that case. The case was originally brought by a white business teacher who claimed her layoff while a black business teacher with equal qualifications was kept on constituted reverse discrimination. Justice's change in positions can probably be ascribed to the confirmation of Deval Patrick as asst attorney general for civil rights.

Author: Berkman, Harvey
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Cases, Teachers, Appointments, resignations and dismissals, Reverse discrimination, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Justice seeking stiffer price-fixing sanctions; the $10 million maximum fine would increase tenfold

Article Abstract:

The crime of price fixing is increasingly global and leading the Department of Justice's Antitrust Div to request an increase in the maximum fine allowed by law from $10 mil to $100 mil. The fine under current law is $10 mil unless exceeded by either twice the price fixer's pecuniary earnings or twice the loss to consumers. Even the current law is producing its fair share of guilty pleas, and companies in the manufacturing, real estate, pharmaceutical and advertising industries are examples.

Author: Berkman, Harvey
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Legal Counsel and Prosecution, Antitrust Division, Laws, regulations and rules, Remedies, Archer Daniels Midland Co., ADM, Price fixing, Fines (Penalties)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: SEC revises executive compensation reporting rules. Executive compensation disclosure - the new rules. Proxy statement disclosure in the SEC's new summary compensation table
  • Abstracts: Service in international arbitration in light of articles 2 and 23 of the UNCITRAL rules and international practice
  • Abstracts: No: keeping standards high protects the public. High cost of doing good; more law grads would enter public service with loan-forgiveness plan
  • Abstracts: Yes: the Supreme Court must re-evaluate existing law. Taking the heat: judges in Eastern Europe are struggling against still-repressive regimes to uphold the rule of law
  • Abstracts: 'We are all somebodies': how a Supreme Court justice taught a young lawyer the meaning of the law. Where there's smoke; testing the boundaries of prisoner rights
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.