Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Sodomy laws challenged; gay activists find successes in some state courts, legislatures

Article Abstract:

Gay rights activists are enjoying some success in their attempt through both state courts and legislatures to repeal sodomy laws. The Texas Supreme Court is reviewing Morales v. Texas, an appellate court decision which struck down the state's sodomy law. The issue is whether the Texas Constitution's privacy provisions protect gay sexual behavior. In 1992, the Kentucky Supreme Court struck down the state's sodomy law in Wasson v. Kentucky. A trial court decision in MOHR v. Kelley to strike down the Michigan law was not appealed.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Discrimination against gays, Sodomy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Boy's consent to search not valid; to Darrin Davis' relief, court says 10-year-old can't waive parents' rights

Article Abstract:

The Georgia Supreme Court has ruled that a 12-year-old was too young to consent to a search of his family's home which turned up drugs in his parents' bedroom. The child had returned home after attending a 'Just say no to drugs' workshop at school and called 911 after seeing a suspicious powder in his parents' bedroom. The court did not go quite as far as defense attorneys wished, declining to state categorically that anyone younger than 13 is too immature to consent to a search.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Narcotics, Control of, Narcotics control, Searches and seizures, Consent (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No forced fatherhood; state high court rules for ex-husband in frozen embryo case

Article Abstract:

A divorced couple's fight over the fate of frozen embryos produced during their marriage is still winding its way through the courts. In Jun 1992, the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that Junior Davis' constitutional right to privacy would be infringed if he were forced into fatherhood by means of embryos not yet implanted. Due to the Supreme Court's recent reluctance to intervene in state affairs, it is unlikely that the case will progress to that level.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Divorce settlements, Frozen human embryos

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Gay law no longer closeted; family issues face courts and lawmakers. Discipline cases steady for now; but change is in offing
  • Abstracts: Conflict of laws; real-world rules for interstate regulation of practice. Fighting words; what was once comical is now costly
  • Abstracts: Rising stars in the law: 40 young attorneys who are making their mark; they pursue success within the system and seek change outside of it
  • Abstracts: Michigan drug law struck down; life without parole for cocaine possession violates state constitution, court rules
  • Abstracts: One opinion, two controversies; 2nd Circuit limits copyright protection for software, approves court expert. Mood swings; D'Alemberte recalls presidential year of political ups and downs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.