Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Suitability claims under Rule 10b-5: are public entities sophisticated enough to use derivatives?

Article Abstract:

Public entities bringing suit against brokers or advisers for losses resulting from investment in derivative instruments should not be considered unsophisticated investors for the purpose of alleging suitability claims under Rule 10b-5. Claims that recommended investments were unsuitably risky should be limited to individual investors. Public officials should be forced to monitor investments and should not be indemnified. The misrepresentation provisions of Rule 10b-5 will adequately protect public entities if there has been any actual wrongdoing by investment advisers.

Author: Roberts, Lyle
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1996
Derivatives (Financial instruments), Investment advisers, Malpractice, Institutional investments

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Company registration: toward a status-based antifraud regime

Article Abstract:

A status-based antifraud system for securities regulation would provide greater protection and less distortion than the current system or the company-based registration system proposed by the SEC Advisory Committee on the Capital Formation and Regulatory Processes. The status-based antifraud system relies on deterrence, and the level of liability depends on the issuer's market capitalization. This system makes use of market forces and minimizes the distortional impact of transaction exemptions because, unlike the Securities Act of 1933, it is not transaction-based.

Author: Choi, Stephen J.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1997
Business enterprises, Business registration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Implications of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for judicial presumptions of market efficiency

Article Abstract:

Courts' reliance on 'market efficiency' when deciding securities fraud cases should utilize commonsense approaches rather than common law doctrines such as fraud-on-the-market. Congress signaled its desire for more practical approaches in passing the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). Congress moved away from financial theories and toward pragmatic views of securities litigation such as PSLRA's damages limitation provisions.

Author: Carden, Nathaniel
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1998
Analysis, Efficient market theory, Presumptions (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Securities fraud, Interpretation and construction, Securities law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Legal realism and the race question: some realism about realism on race relations. The new legal process, the synthesis of discourse, and the microanalysis of institutions
  • Abstracts: Land use regulations and the Takings Clause: are courts applying a tougher standard to regulators after Nollan?
  • Abstracts: The copyrightability of factual compilations: an interpretation of Feist through cases of maps and numbers. Compilations and the AFC test
  • Abstracts: Strategic hostile acquisitions. Introduction to hostile takeovers. Doing a deal for a public company: slide presentation summary
  • Abstracts: Youth curfews and the trilogy of parent, child, and state relations. Juvenile curfew: legal perspectives and beyond
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.