Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Takeover specialists; why many litigators hand their cases to High Court pros

Article Abstract:

Only about 80 cases make up the Supreme Court calendar each term, down from the 150 or so it used to hear, and an even higher percentage is argued by lawyers whose specialty is Supreme Court work. These specialists state that understanding the Court's unique role, the views of each justice and how to work with local counsel are what count. The key first step is drafting the kind of certiorari petition which will guarantee a hearing for the case. Charles Cooper, a Washington, DC Supreme Court specialist, maintains that 98% of cases are won or lost with a denial.

Author: France, Steve
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Attorneys, Practice, Legal specialization, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Free exercise gives courts a workout; appeals panel protects bankrupts' tithes and resurrects religious freedom act

Article Abstract:

Appellate judges, scholars and civil libertarians disagree on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which holds that government cannot burden a person's religion unless it can demonstrate a compelling interest for doing so. RFRA suporters feel City of Boerne held that RFRA did not compel the federal government to grant more protection to religion than required by the First Amendment, holding only that state governments may not do so, while critics feel the court rejected the law in its entirety.

Author: France, Steve
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Freedom of religion, Separation of powers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A marriage proposal; Vermont Supreme Court seeks common ground on gay unions

Article Abstract:

Baker v. Vermont, the 1999 Vermont Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage is discussed. Baker directed the legislature to either provide for same-sex marriage licenses or devise a domestic partner system giving all or most of those rights and privileges the law provides to married partners.

Author: France, Steve
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2000
Vermont, Same-sex marriage

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Trading on trial outcomes; industry analysts monitor big cases to keep tabs on stock probabilities. Go West, young publishers; court frees up case notations for use by competing cut-rate researchers
  • Abstracts: Nonformalistic law in time and space. Interpretation, empiricism, and the closure problem. Form and substance in law and morality
  • Abstracts: Central East Asian maritime boundaries and the law of the sea. Progress in international criminal law?
  • Abstracts: The misuse of integration, no representation, and no reliance clauses in the name of contract certainty
  • Abstracts: Look who's chatting; Pennsylvania lawyers had better introduce themselves on the Internet. Database detectives; lawyers are using the Internet to hunt information and win big
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.