Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The EEOC has delineated the risk of liability for retaliation when an employer takes action against a worker who complains of discrimination or harassment

Article Abstract:

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has explained in its 1998 'Compliance Manual' when an employer is guilty of retaliation for taking action against an employee complaining of discrimination, suggesting that the agency views protections against retaliation broadly. The laws can protect an employee's opposition to discrimination so long as the employee acted in the 'reasonable and good-faith belief' that the practice was discrimination. Ways employers have for protecting themselves against retaliation claims are listed.

Author: Wallach, Eric J., Greenfield, Mark E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Standards, United States. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Age discrimination coverage has limits

Article Abstract:

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) gives employers numerous exemptions to the rule that they disregard peoples' age in making employment decisions. The ADEA has a vague definition of 'employee,' moreover, churches and small businesses are exempt from its requirements. Some political appointees and politicians' personal staffs are also excluded. Age discrimination is also permissible when age is a 'bona fide occupational qualification.' The courts have often considered ADEA cases.

Author: Wallach, Eric J., Meiman, Janet Ellis
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Laws, regulations and rules, Age discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The self-critical analysis privilege has been recognized as federal common law in Title VII and other cases in order to promote the perceived public interest

Article Abstract:

An employer should be aware of the applicability of the self-critical analysis privilege to any project or self-evaluative report performed by the company. The privilege was upheld in two federal cases from the 1970s, Bredice v. Doctors Hospital and Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co., but has since then come under attack. All steps should be taken to maintain a report's confidentiality and the report's intentions should be made clear in writing.

Author: Wallach, Eric J., Reider, Leslie, Ginetto, Anthony C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Accounting and auditing, Corporate governance, Corporations, Privileges and immunities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Bending the rules: flexible regulation and constraints on agency discretion. Executive Branch legal interpretation: a perspective from the Office of Legal Counsel
  • Abstracts: Courts consider COBRA claims involving insurer liability and whether improper notice extends election and continuation periods
  • Abstracts: That control thing; employment status of worker defines tax obligations. Crunch time; last-minute tax planning can still pay off in 1992
  • Abstracts: RTC runs into historic roadblock on seizure; preservationists use agency interest to force halt of property sale
  • Abstracts: Benefits practitioners take warning: contributions of unused vacation pay to employee benefit plans raise complex issues
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.